Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to The Pit Lane. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Formula 1 facing anti-bias probe
Topic Started: Aug 2 2009, 11:03 AM (188 Views)
Steelstallions
Member Avatar
Driver
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbys...bias-probe.html

Quote:
 
Formula 1 motor racing could face an anti-competition investigation after a complaint was lodged on Wednesday with the European Commission alleging bias in the sport's selection process for new entrants. The complaint was made by Serbian engineering company AMCO which intended to enter F1 next year with its Stefan Grand Prix team, named after chief executive Zoran Stefanovic. He claims that F1's governing body, the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), broke competition law by insisting that new teams use engines made by Northamptonshire-based Cosworth. Its complaint says that "AMCO Corporation was forced by the FIA to sign with Cosworth and AMCO is complaining because of that... There is an element of plot behind our back which we are not capable of getting rid of without the Directorate General for Competition."

AMCO originally planned to use an engine from F1's current manufacturers, such as Mercedes and Ferrari, but reluctantly agreed to switch to Cosworth as per the FIA's alleged demand.

However AMCO's application was rejected and it has complained to the EC in an attempt to get the selection process carried out again.

AMCO claims that the justification for this is a breach of the competition law preventing restrictive practices which "limit or control production, markets, technical development, or investment..."

The risk that the EC could declare the selection process invalid may alone be enough to derail the plans of Manor, Campos and US F1, the three teams which were selected by the FIA to join F1 next year. They are in the process of raising the $100 million (£60 million) needed to compete in F1 and any cloud over their participation could weaken their chances. However, AMCO said that carrying out the team selection again would ultimately be in the best interests of the sport because preventing other manufacturers from supplying engines "is an act of limiting technical development, not just competition, and such restriction is blatantly damaging to Formula 1."

This would not be the first time that F1 has suffered the wrath of the EC.

In the late 1990s the FIA had to sell the rights to the sport for 100 years and made significant changes to its structure after a ruling that it had restricted competition through its support of F1.


Interesting, very interesting Mr Mosley <think>
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Red Andy
Member Avatar

Moderator
Sounds like another case of sour grapes for me.

The entry criteria for the 2010 championship required that teams already have an engine deal in place before applying. It's just that Cosworth were the only engine manufacturer prepared to strike deals with teams that may or may not get accepted.

There are already rumours that USF1 are considering ditching Cosworth in favour of Toyota, so these deals are obviously not watertight.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sportsman
Member Avatar
Chief Engineer
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Red Andy,Aug 2 2009
11:52 AM
Sounds like another case of sour grapes for me.

The entry criteria for the 2010 championship required that teams already have an engine deal in place before applying. It's just that Cosworth were the only engine manufacturer prepared to strike deals with teams that may or may not get accepted.

There are already rumours that USF1 are considering ditching Cosworth in favour of Toyota, so these deals are obviously not watertight.

And the 1.2 million deposit already paid to Cosworth by the new teams signed up with them to use their engine.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Norbert
Member Avatar

Admin
Hmmm... didn't March use Cosworth engines rather a lot.....

<roflmao>
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Red Andy
Member Avatar

Moderator
Here's one other little factoid that may, possibly, have had a bearing on Stefan Grand Prix's rejection.

One of the people he has working for him, in a consultancy role apparently, is none other than Mike Coughlan! <yikes>
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
John
Team Boss
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boo, hiss...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Alien_SAP_Fiend
Member Avatar
Chief Engineer
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5471816,00.html

Quote:
 
"Exactly that was said to me," Richards told motorsport-magazin.com, "I must have a Cosworth engine if I wanted to be in the F1 World Championship.

"However, I had an agreement with McLaren and thought that we would not be as competitive with a Cosworth engine, so I was not ready to change partner.

"If the regulations had meant, from the beginning, that we were only allowed in if we used such an engine, then I would have known the situation, but I do not believe that it is appropriate for those in charge of the sport to say such a thing."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
« Previous Topic · Formula 1 · Next Topic »
Add Reply