| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| caption anyone? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 2 2016, 05:14 AM (1,039 Views) | |
| John Galt | Oct 4 2016, 08:29 AM Post #51 |
|
Fulla-Carp
|
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tax-returns-estate-taxes-hillary-clinton-2016-10 |
| Let us begin anew, remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness. | |
![]() |
|
| Larry | Oct 4 2016, 09:53 AM Post #52 |
![]()
Mmmmmmm, pie!
|
Bullsh!t. In commercial real estate there was a global boom that peaked in 1989, after which came a bust that saw asset values deflate like crazy, a bust in asset values that didn't begin to turn around until 94. Taxes filed in 95 are for the year 94, and could include losses not taken in previous years. When you can show me where the man broke a law, get back to me. Until then, this is just another democrat witch hunt. |
|
Of the Pokatwat Tribe | |
![]() |
|
| John Galt | Oct 4 2016, 10:45 AM Post #53 |
|
Fulla-Carp
|
The Trump returns in question are 1995 tax year returns (see the heading on the form that says "For the year January 1 through December 31, 1995..."). There's no date I can see on the form for when it was filed, but it had to be 1996 or after. ![]()
Then you seem to agree with what I quoted previously from the BI article: "1995 taxes reflect not just a large carried-forward loss from prior years, but also a $16 million loss from real estate and other partnerships related to 1995 itself. Real-estate investments were on the upswing again in 1995"
Who said he broke the law?
Of course it is. Quid pro quo and all that. That's what politics is all about these days. |
| Let us begin anew, remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness. | |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |








4:58 PM Jul 10