| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Re: Ayn Rand | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 24 2014, 09:40 AM (1,374 Views) | |
| Klaus | Dec 27 2014, 04:23 AM Post #76 |
![]()
HOLY CARP!!!
|
What kinds of contradictions in the standard model are you talking about? There is a well-known inconsistency with general relativity, but everybody knows that the standard model is not the final word. One can easily apply text analysis to Ayn Rand or the bible, but one would need a more concrete question to develop an algorithm. |
| Trifonov Fleisher Klaus Sokolov Zimmerman | |
![]() |
|
| Dewey | Dec 27 2014, 05:48 AM Post #77 |
![]()
HOLY CARP!!!
|
The rationale was that the land could not be truly owned by any human; it all belonged to God, who had apportioned and entrusted it to the various tribes and clans in a way intended to provided for all the people. That apportionment was intended to assure that the basic needs for all would be provided for, that any financial setback that caused someone to sell their land would be relatively temporary, and that within a relatively short order, the economic scales would be reset, to enable those who were on the bottom to get a fresh start. The only scriptural exception to this policy was the sale of homes within the city, which could be sold permanently - since the urban land didn't produce food, it wasn't as critical to the overall provision and good. On the subject of food, there was also a biblical stipulation that farmers were not to harvest their crops completely. They were instructed, the scriptures say by God, to leave the crops at the edges of the fields there for the poor to harvest. Same with the main body of the fields; if they dropped anything or missed it on the first pass, they were to leave it and allow the poor to take it. This is the process called "gleaning." |
|
"By nature, i prefer brevity." - John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, p. 685. "Never waste your time trying to explain yourself to people who are committed to misunderstanding you." - Anonymous "Oh sure, every once in a while a turd floated by, but other than that it was just fine." - Joe A., 2011 I'll answer your other comments later, but my primary priority for the rest of the evening is to get drunk." - Klaus, 12/31/14 | |
![]() |
|
| Mikhailoh | Dec 27 2014, 06:12 AM Post #78 |
|
If you want trouble, find yourself a redhead
|
I'm sure the poor had a really swell life then, eating off the edge of the fields and whatever was dropped. Not like today when they have to wait for the deposit on their debit cards to go to the grocery.
|
|
Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead - Lucille Ball | |
![]() |
|
| Jolly | Dec 27 2014, 06:35 AM Post #79 |
![]()
Geaux Tigers!
|
Well, that's the wiki of it, but I don't think of it that way. In OT or modern times, a field may not be harvested all at one time. The harvest may require multiple pickings. To me, gleaning comes into effect when a crop starts to become more trouble than it's worth for the farmer. It's things like the second picking of corn, when you pull the nubbins. Or the last couple of pickings of peas. Or the fact that cotton has quite a few bolls come in late. There is still good product in the field, it just requires more work to harvest. |
| The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.- George Soros | |
![]() |
|
| Axtremus | Dec 27 2014, 12:05 PM Post #80 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Ah, a good old cost/benefit analysis the capitalists can understand.
|
![]() |
|
| Axtremus | Dec 27 2014, 12:07 PM Post #81 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
It seems to me Ayn Rand would object to both. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |










4:33 PM Jul 10