| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| GOP-controlled Senate -- GOP ready to govern? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 1 2014, 08:04 PM (127 Views) | |
| Axtremus | Oct 1 2014, 08:04 PM Post #1 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Article: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/good-news-democrats-youre-going-to-lose-111467.html The article acknowledges that the GOP will very likely win control of the Senate in this year's mid-term election, then it proceeds to argue that the GOP would not be able to govern, and how that might turn out to be good news for the Democrats in 2016. Agree or disagree? What do you wish to see the GOP accomplish by winning control of both the House and the Senate? Are you optimistic about the GOP actually accomplishing it if it indeed controls both the House and the Senate?
|
![]() |
|
| Larry | Oct 1 2014, 09:11 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Mmmmmmm, pie!
|
I think just getting rid of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the two biggest mentally deficient morons in Congress, will be enough to ensure a better run congress than we have now. |
|
Of the Pokatwat Tribe | |
![]() |
|
| Axtremus | Oct 2 2014, 02:28 AM Post #3 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Kindly elaborate, if you will: What do you mean by "better run"? Better run to do what, exactly? |
![]() |
|
| Mikhailoh | Oct 2 2014, 04:28 AM Post #4 |
|
If you want trouble, find yourself a redhead
|
It is difficult to say, but the premise of the article has a point. There is a rift in the GOP between the more centrist and the Tea Party factions. If they don't get together it could be a bloodbath in 2016. |
|
Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead - Lucille Ball | |
![]() |
|
| jon-nyc | Oct 2 2014, 05:02 AM Post #5 |
|
Cheers
|
Right, inter-party gridlock has mostly masked intra-party gridlock. (With some notable exceptions). The GOP winning the Senate will make intra-party disfunction more visible, and will also more closely associate congressional unpopularity with the GOP. Both of those could help the Democrats in 2016, at the very least there would be something for the Democrats to run against, like the GOP will have the obama record to run against. |
| In my defense, I was left unsupervised. | |
![]() |
|
| Copper | Oct 2 2014, 05:13 AM Post #6 |
|
Shortstop
|
Following the trend of the last couple years I don't see how the democrat party could have any members left by 2016. |
|
The Confederate soldier was peculiar in that he was ever ready to fight, but never ready to submit to the routine duty and discipline of the camp or the march. The soldiers were determined to be soldiers after their own notions, and do their duty, for the love of it, as they thought best. Carlton McCarthy | |
![]() |
|
| Improviso | Oct 2 2014, 05:46 AM Post #7 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Shhhhhh... don't jinx it. The Repub's are notorious for shooting themselves in the foot at the last minute. |
|
Identifying narcissists isn't difficult. Just look for the person who is constantly fishing for compliments and admiration while breaking down over even the slightest bit of criticism. We have the freedom to choose our actions, but we do not get to choose our consequences. | |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |







11:29 AM Jul 11