| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| A history of Gov't shutdowns; Not sure why Mik hadn't posted this here | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 3 2013, 08:24 AM (204 Views) | |
| Kincaid | Oct 3 2013, 08:24 AM Post #1 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
so here it is. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/360142/government-shutdowns-history-charles-c-w-cooke This gives some nice perspective. My argument against the shutdown is simply politics - I think it will damage the GOP more than the Democrats (though so far the polls show it is a lot closer than I thought). |
| Kincaid - disgusted Republican Partisan since 2006. | |
![]() |
|
| Mikhailoh | Oct 3 2013, 08:29 AM Post #2 |
|
If you want trouble, find yourself a redhead
|
i was leaving it for you, my friend. Political slant aside, the history is interesting. |
|
Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead - Lucille Ball | |
![]() |
|
| Kincaid | Oct 3 2013, 09:22 AM Post #3 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
I would bet that the same arguments were used by whatever party was in the majority in the past shut downs. And will be used again.
Edited by Kincaid, Oct 3 2013, 09:22 AM.
|
| Kincaid - disgusted Republican Partisan since 2006. | |
![]() |
|
| bachophile | Oct 3 2013, 10:43 AM Post #4 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
I think the repubs basically shot themselves in the ass and helped Hillary get a step closer to the whitehouse. |
| "I don't know much about classical music. For years I thought the Goldberg Variations were something Mr. and Mrs. Goldberg did on their wedding night." Woody Allen | |
![]() |
|
| jon-nyc | Oct 3 2013, 11:40 AM Post #5 |
|
Cheers
|
Which is why the more thoughtful ones didn't want to go down this path. |
| In my defense, I was left unsupervised. | |
![]() |
|
| Steve Miller | Oct 3 2013, 08:05 PM Post #6 |
|
Bull-Carp
|
And are likely to get thrown out in the primaries. Nice little corner they've painted themselves in to, this. |
|
Wag more Bark less | |
![]() |
|
| Steve Miller | Oct 3 2013, 08:06 PM Post #7 |
|
Bull-Carp
|
|
|
Wag more Bark less | |
![]() |
|
| Klaus | Oct 4 2013, 01:33 AM Post #8 |
![]()
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Three party system? Given the voting system in the US, wouldn't a three party system at best be a short-lived exceptional situation? |
| Trifonov Fleisher Klaus Sokolov Zimmerman | |
![]() |
|
| Mikhailoh | Oct 4 2013, 05:32 AM Post #9 |
|
If you want trouble, find yourself a redhead
|
Not necessarily. There is a growing disaffection with both parties, and although they are long standing ones, they are by no means guaranteed permanence. What is happening here is legislators are listening to the people who sent them to Washington. I believe the feeling is that we will feel pain one way or the other - there is no way to avoiding the spending and debt hangover. Better to feel it now before we are in deeper. There are also very deep feelings about the role and size of the federal government. We are seeing growing pains. How this all shakes out is yet to be seen. |
|
Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead - Lucille Ball | |
![]() |
|
| Aqua Letifer | Oct 4 2013, 06:15 AM Post #10 |
|
ZOOOOOM!
|
And that's really the problem. |
| I cite irreconcilable differences. | |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |







12:45 AM Jul 11