| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Pope Benedict protected child molester | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 13 2010, 01:42 AM (4,474 Views) | |
| Piano*Dad | Mar 15 2010, 03:56 PM Post #226 |
|
Bull-Carp
|
OK Quirt, we disagree. Not for the first time.
|
![]() |
|
| Mikhailoh | Mar 15 2010, 04:04 PM Post #227 |
|
If you want trouble, find yourself a redhead
|
As do I, but that was already known. |
|
Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead - Lucille Ball | |
![]() |
|
| Mikhailoh | Mar 15 2010, 04:06 PM Post #228 |
|
If you want trouble, find yourself a redhead
|
Speaking of personae. But hey - they're talking. It's a good thread. |
|
Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead - Lucille Ball | |
![]() |
|
| ivorythumper | Mar 15 2010, 06:12 PM Post #229 |
|
I am so adjective that I verb nouns!
|
We are not talking about the evidentiary process of canonical court in the Catholic Church. We are talking about on what basis Jon can make the definitive claim that Ratzinger failed in his moral duty in the court of Jon's own conscience. I am merely pointing out that he really does not seem to know enough about the true facts of this situation, and he admits to assumptions, and he is quite clear and explicit that he thinks Catholicism is foul. Each of these by themselves, let alone collectively, suggest that he should be adverse to making particular judgments if he wants to be fair minded in judging the particular facts of this case. His interest might well make him a good prosecutor in this case, but his bias should preclude him from being a judge or a jury member -- even in the court of his own conscience. |
| The dogma lives loudly within me. | |
![]() |
|
| Renauda | Mar 15 2010, 06:46 PM Post #230 |
![]()
HOLY CARP!!!
|
As your own interest might well make you a good Defence lawyer in this case with a bias which should preclude you from being a judge or jury member. It's a two way street. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |








11:12 AM Jul 11