| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Iraq 'worse than Vietnam'; egad! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 27 2006, 11:23 AM (182 Views) | |
| mmmaestro007 | Nov 27 2006, 11:23 AM Post #1 |
|
Middle Aged Carp
|
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1798632.htm "A security expert says he believes coalition forces face the prospect of defeat in Iraq with serious consequences. Former soldier and military historian Robert O'Neill says it is likely the coalition will pull its troops out early. In a speech to the Lowy Institute in Sydney tonight, Professor O'Neill, who served during the Vietnam War, described Iraq as "an even worse problem than Vietnam". He says the coalition invaded Iraq with a flawed strategy, insufficient troops to do the job, and no policy in place for responding to the insurgency and chaos that would follow the toppling of Saddam Hussein. "I don't think that our Government had any idea of the morass that is was about to set foot into," he said. Professor O'Neill says the coalition should have foreseen the need for a much greater number of troops to restore order to Iraq. "People who'd known a bit of history would have, first of all, expected the place to blow up mightily once Saddam's authority was removed," he said." |
|
"Madam, you have between your legs an instrument capable of giving pleasure to thousands, and all you can do is scratch it!" Sir Thomas Beechem, conductor | |
![]() |
|
| John D'Oh | Nov 27 2006, 11:32 AM Post #2 |
|
MAMIL
|
This is the bit that puzzles me, and he's absolutely correct. Why was it apparently overlooked? |
| What do you mean "we", have you got a mouse in your pocket? | |
![]() |
|
| The 89th Key | Nov 27 2006, 11:40 AM Post #3 |
|
I'm honestly puzzled as to how one can label us leaving early as "defeat". We came in, we beat the Iraq army, we have accomplished everything we set out to do except leave with Iraq in relative peace. If we left early, it might be irresponsible, premature, but it would most certainly not be a defeat. |
![]() |
|
| John D'Oh | Nov 27 2006, 11:46 AM Post #4 |
|
MAMIL
|
That's what some say about Vietnam. It's bollocks. The only really important objective is the lasting one. |
| What do you mean "we", have you got a mouse in your pocket? | |
![]() |
|
| JBryan | Nov 27 2006, 11:49 AM Post #5 |
![]()
I am the grey one
|
Leaving Iraq worse off and a worse threat to the world than we entered it is a defeat by any calculus. |
|
"Any man who would make an X rated movie should be forced to take his daughter to see it". - John Wayne There is a line we cross when we go from "I will believe it when I see it" to "I will see it when I believe it". Henry II: I marvel at you after all these years. Still like a democratic drawbridge: going down for everybody. Eleanor: At my age there's not much traffic anymore. From The Lion in Winter. | |
![]() |
|
| Steve Cohen | Nov 27 2006, 12:04 PM Post #6 |
![]()
Junior Carp
|
For sure! |
|
"I wouldn't mind paying taxes if I knew they were going to a friendly country!" - Dick Gregory Dealer Principal and Industry Consultant Jasons Music Centers - Family Owned Since 1937 - Serving Maryland/DC | |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |









4:41 PM Jul 10