| Welcome to The New Coffee Room. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Silly Catholics; When will they get with the times? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 8 2006, 03:17 AM (505 Views) | |
| George K | May 8 2006, 03:17 AM Post #1 |
|
Finally
|
Silly Catholics As the release date of the filmed version of The Da Vinci Code draws nearer, a lot of Catholic officials are getting more and more disturbed. In fact, one Cardinal is urging that Catholics around the world not only boycott the film, but take legal action against the film's creators, distributors, and theatres. Once again, the Catholic Church is showing just how out of date and behind the times it is. If they REALLY wanted to garner the respect of the world and silence its detractors, here are some of the things they should have done first: 1) Issue a death sentence against Dan Brown, the book's author. 2) Hold massive riots against the book and movie. 3) Issue death threats against Tom Hanks and everyone else involved in the film. 4) Kill several people, such as book store employees who sold the novel, by beheading or some other gruesome manner. 5) Burn down book stores that stock the book. Once they have created a suitable climate of fear around their wrath, THEN you have the authority to issue demands like those in these lawsuits. But those Catholics are just too dumb or too stubborn to recognize that Islam has proven the one true, sure-fire method for a religion to gain enough respect (or fear) to get its way around the world. I suppose I should be glad the Catholics are as clueless as they are. After all, Dan Brown is a fellow American, and as a co-citizen of his, I could easily be lynched in his place. |
|
A guide to GKSR: Click "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08 Nothing is as effective as homeopathy. I'd rather listen to an hour of Abba than an hour of The Beatles. - Klaus, 4/29/18 | |
![]() |
|
| Luke's Dad | May 8 2006, 06:56 AM Post #2 |
![]()
Emperor Pengin
|
Absolutely right, it's what any civilized religion of peace would do. |
| The problem with having an open mind is that people keep trying to put things in it. | |
![]() |
|
| sue | May 8 2006, 07:15 AM Post #3 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
And the film's producers are rubbing their hands together and jumping with joy! Oh boy, more free press! We're gonna make millions! |
![]() |
|
| George K | May 8 2006, 07:18 AM Post #4 |
|
Finally
|
Am I the only one that finds it ironic that this controversy didn't erupt until the movie was going to be released. The book has been out for what, 3 years? Where was the "outrage" then. It's probably a conspiracy of Dan Brown and Opus Dei to get more free publicity for the book and movie. Yeah! That's the ticket. |
|
A guide to GKSR: Click "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08 Nothing is as effective as homeopathy. I'd rather listen to an hour of Abba than an hour of The Beatles. - Klaus, 4/29/18 | |
![]() |
|
| JBryan | May 8 2006, 07:26 AM Post #5 |
![]()
I am the grey one
|
It must be the type of media orientation. The Passion of the Christ seemed to spark a lot more controversy than the book as well. At least on the particular subject it addressed. |
|
"Any man who would make an X rated movie should be forced to take his daughter to see it". - John Wayne There is a line we cross when we go from "I will believe it when I see it" to "I will see it when I believe it". Henry II: I marvel at you after all these years. Still like a democratic drawbridge: going down for everybody. Eleanor: At my age there's not much traffic anymore. From The Lion in Winter. | |
![]() |
|
| John D'Oh | May 8 2006, 07:37 AM Post #6 |
|
MAMIL
|
A gross generalisation, I know, but maybe the people who tend to get most upset are those who don't read a whole lot of books?
|
| What do you mean "we", have you got a mouse in your pocket? | |
![]() |
|
| kenny | May 8 2006, 08:11 AM Post #7 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Hahahah! Good one!
|
![]() |
|
| ivorythumper | May 8 2006, 09:51 AM Post #8 |
|
I am so adjective that I verb nouns!
|
When DVC first came out there was a whole slew of books debunking the claims made by Brown. Maybe you and John need to read more...
|
| The dogma lives loudly within me. | |
![]() |
|
| John D'Oh | May 8 2006, 09:57 AM Post #9 |
|
MAMIL
|
Isn't it a work of fiction, just like The Satanic Verses was? Why get your panties in a bunch over a work of fiction? |
| What do you mean "we", have you got a mouse in your pocket? | |
![]() |
|
| ivorythumper | May 8 2006, 12:05 PM Post #10 |
|
I am so adjective that I verb nouns!
|
No one I know of has their panties in a bunch -- apart from those who wish to attack the Catholics for using the opportunity of this media event to proclaim their side of the story. The problem is that not every is edumecated enough to realize that it is a work of fiction. |
| The dogma lives loudly within me. | |
![]() |
|
| LWpianistin | May 8 2006, 12:13 PM Post #11 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
well, then isn't that indiviual's problem? it's their own fault they're so gullible. |
| And how are you today? | |
![]() |
|
| AlbertaCrude | May 8 2006, 12:35 PM Post #12 |
|
Bull-Carp
|
Reading DVC last year was a reminder as to why I, in general, do not care for novels. It was a perfect example of poor fiction and bad storytelling. I trust however the screenplay adaption will be better. |
![]() |
|
| ivorythumper | May 8 2006, 12:38 PM Post #13 |
|
I am so adjective that I verb nouns!
|
I am not sure of your point... It may be "their own fault" that they are so gullible, it might be a naturally low IQ, or it might be a poor education. Regardless, one of the traditional "spiritual works of mercy" is to instruct the ignorant. I hope you are not arguing that it is better to leave people in a condition of ignorance and bigotry, and that the Church (or anyone for that matter) has no business in trying to set the record straight. |
| The dogma lives loudly within me. | |
![]() |
|
| Dewey | May 8 2006, 12:38 PM Post #14 |
![]()
HOLY CARP!!!
|
Exactly. |
|
"By nature, i prefer brevity." - John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, p. 685. "Never waste your time trying to explain yourself to people who are committed to misunderstanding you." - Anonymous "Oh sure, every once in a while a turd floated by, but other than that it was just fine." - Joe A., 2011 I'll answer your other comments later, but my primary priority for the rest of the evening is to get drunk." - Klaus, 12/31/14 | |
![]() |
|
| John D'Oh | May 8 2006, 12:39 PM Post #15 |
|
MAMIL
|
You're right, and the publishers play on this sort of lunacy. They do say that there's no such thing as bad publicity, but try telling that to Michael Jackson.
|
| What do you mean "we", have you got a mouse in your pocket? | |
![]() |
|
| LWpianistin | May 8 2006, 12:43 PM Post #16 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
no, no, no! of course not! i just don't understand how people can believe it is a work of non-fiction....
|
| And how are you today? | |
![]() |
|
| Aqua Letifer | May 8 2006, 01:15 PM Post #17 |
|
ZOOOOOM!
|
Because it's full of information that is not fictional. And also because it's advertised as being "based on fact", and Dan Brown himself swears up and down that "the book is factual". This isn't just fanatics trying to make more out of the book than it is, it's being built up as such by the author. |
| I cite irreconcilable differences. | |
![]() |
|
| LWpianistin | May 8 2006, 01:18 PM Post #18 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
well, he's stupid. still, it's CLEARLY fictional. sure, there are non-fictional "things" in the book, but to me, it is just a ficticious, slightly entertaining summer read. nothing more, nothing less. same with A&D. why is that not as big a deal as DC? maybe i should read it again. |
| And how are you today? | |
![]() |
|
| sue | May 8 2006, 01:22 PM Post #19 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
oh, no doubt. |
![]() |
|
| ivorythumper | May 8 2006, 01:41 PM Post #20 |
|
I am so adjective that I verb nouns!
|
Stupid? He's obviously smart enough to get stinkin' rich off the whole thing. I should be so stupid... :lol: |
| The dogma lives loudly within me. | |
![]() |
|
| Aqua Letifer | May 8 2006, 01:53 PM Post #21 |
|
ZOOOOOM!
|
Yeah, I personally considered it a quick, interesting read, but definitely nothing that would be considered a classic in a few decades from now. I have no idea why books like these get to be so popular, and Philip Dick's Androids novel goes unnoticed. (Actually, I think I do, but I won't get into it.) |
| I cite irreconcilable differences. | |
![]() |
|
| LWpianistin | May 8 2006, 01:53 PM Post #22 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
:lol: well, i couldn't think of a better word. |
| And how are you today? | |
![]() |
|
| John D'Oh | May 8 2006, 02:58 PM Post #23 |
|
MAMIL
|
Was Uri Geller famous over here? A second rate conjuror passing himself as some kind of mystic, and he's enormously succesfull, at least for a while. This is the same kind of thing. Bad history masquerading as fiction, or mediocre fiction masquerading as history. "No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." |
| What do you mean "we", have you got a mouse in your pocket? | |
![]() |
|
| iainhp | May 8 2006, 03:03 PM Post #24 |
|
Middle Aged Carp
|
Fiction - fact? You just have to have faith! |
![]() |
|
| LWpianistin | May 8 2006, 04:28 PM Post #25 |
|
HOLY CARP!!!
|
i've heard that Androids is very good, at least according to my dad and brother. |
| And how are you today? | |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The New Coffee Room · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2









no, no, no! of course not!
i just don't understand how people can believe it is a work of non-fiction....

10:48 AM Jul 11