| Welcome to Rockman EXE: Rogue Network. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The "Everything you ever wanted to know" Thread | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 21 2007, 06:35 PM (23,454 Views) | |
| Twi | May 10 2009, 12:09 PM Post #701 |
![]()
*Wink*
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
YES, but the battle count resets to 1. |
![]() |
|
| May 10 2009, 04:32 PM Post #702 | |
|
...Monster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As far as I know, there is no full limit for Elecreel and is completely up to the moderator's discretion. If the group was very tight knit, the RP was excellent and the conditions were optimal, it could probably hit a group of 8? |
![]() |
|
| The_Grim_Reaper | May 11 2009, 01:48 AM Post #703 |
|
Unregistered
|
Yes, you can enter another player's battle thread, but you may only do so between battles. Also, the battle counter resets, so you cannot enter someone's battle thread just before their #5 battle and expect a mini boss. |
|
|
| Frelia | May 11 2009, 10:35 AM Post #704 |
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
'Nuther question. Is it possible to post on a BBS as the Operator while the Navi is battling? |
![]() |
|
| Shuryou | May 11 2009, 10:41 AM Post #705 |
![]()
Rogue Navi
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes. And if the Navi has the 'Multi Tasking' feat, he or she can also post while fighting. |
![]() |
|
| SpaceMonkeySteve | May 11 2009, 04:27 PM Post #706 |
![]()
Terrestrial Loser
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That is to say, sometimes people post with their Navi while busting inexplicably, since there really isn't a way to punish for it. |
![]() |
|
| Hiko | May 11 2009, 07:30 PM Post #707 |
![]()
10/1/09, happy birthday 4chan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I thought the policy was for every post out-of-thread, that's one post your navi has to go without chips? |
![]() |
|
| May 11 2009, 08:15 PM Post #708 | |
|
...Monster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's if your Netop goes to the store or leaves the PET for whatever reason. Posting on a BBS can still be done from a PET, kinda like opening another browser window. |
![]() |
|
| Hiko | May 11 2009, 09:19 PM Post #709 |
![]()
10/1/09, happy birthday 4chan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh, alright. Just making sure. |
![]() |
|
| The_Grim_Reaper | May 19 2009, 01:32 AM Post #710 |
|
Unregistered
|
Is it possible for a SP to perform "friendship actions" or somehow assist in the acquisition of bonus FXP? (ACTIONS: Machman -insert virus pwning here- Aera: -more virus pwning- Aera: Cheer partner / Defend partner / Use Elec Element to combo off partner's attack, etc.) |
|
|
| SpaceMonkeySteve | May 20 2009, 03:50 PM Post #711 |
![]()
Terrestrial Loser
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Are you asking if an SP can do support for a different Navi to get FXP for it's master? Yes. Druidman has worn Seraphim's armor before, so I'd assume it's allowed. XD |
![]() |
|
| Goroke | May 25 2009, 11:19 AM Post #712 |
![]()
I TOLD YOU ABOUT THE GUNCANNON, BRO!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How will taunt work on a regular player navi? I know it's something like berserk, but what will the exact effect be? One action forced attack with buster? |
![]() |
|
| Niax | May 25 2009, 03:06 PM Post #713 |
|
I am NOT a morning person!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I imagine that it just raises your aggro while teamed, making you more likely to be hit, kinda the opposite of the shadow subtype passive... |
![]() |
|
| Goroke | May 25 2009, 07:33 PM Post #714 |
![]()
I TOLD YOU ABOUT THE GUNCANNON, BRO!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That doesn't sound too useful at all. Especially since it's one vs one, there really isn't too much use if you were to pull an aggro on a single player. Since berserk forces the player to use Busters through out the entire turn, maybe it can force the player to attack with a buster (or any Melee/Sword/Etc Equipped) on that action. This is the example that I'm thinking of.
When the mod goes through this action, the Player B's 2nd action (Firetower) will be overridden to a buster attack or a sword if the player equipped it before. |
![]() |
|
| Goroke | May 31 2009, 12:30 AM Post #715 |
![]()
I TOLD YOU ABOUT THE GUNCANNON, BRO!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Round 2 is starting up, and I need to know the answer for this. Friendly Bump! |
![]() |
|
| SpaceMonkeySteve | May 31 2009, 04:33 AM Post #716 |
![]()
Terrestrial Loser
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Taunt doesn't grant berserk or whatever. Basically, at least what I think was the original intent, is that you force things to target you instead of something else. It's similar to abilities in video games where the big tank guys draw the fire onto their bolstered defenses or increased health, so that the smaller, weaker guys don't get hit. That's my interpretation, of course, and if it was decided to make it some totally different effect entirely and I missed it, I apologize. I can tell you that the Berserk effect is currently unusable and under review, so regardless, in a one on one fight, Taunt won't likely help you much. (Though, I suppose under my interpretation you stop the terrain getting damaged or something.) |
![]() |
|
| Goroke | May 31 2009, 06:54 AM Post #717 |
![]()
I TOLD YOU ABOUT THE GUNCANNON, BRO!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In one vs one, it doesn't sound too useful...Also, as MagicCereal stated many times: Why doesn't the Guts type have anything Buster Related? Since Guts type originally had both SuperArmor and Rapid Busters. |
![]() |
|
| Knight | May 31 2009, 11:11 AM Post #718 |
|
The White Void
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think that these subtypes are going for theme and/or function. The original guts didn't have either, or rather it had two. They could have went for the "buster" theme or the "sturdy"-ness. I'm guessing they chose to go for the sturdyness because it fills a team role, while the buster can be enhanced by sigs and stuff anyway. This is just a wild guess though... It's possible that they just didn't want to touch the balance of busters as they are. |
![]() |
|
| Hiko | Jun 20 2009, 01:12 PM Post #719 |
![]()
10/1/09, happy birthday 4chan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Question. My friend, here as notlimah (and not very active) wasn't able to have his operator be obsessed with Pokemon, and had to do some stupid name so that it WASN'T Pokemon. And yet, Goroke gets an entire mission devoted to Pokemon moves? -__- |
![]() |
|
| CC | Jun 20 2009, 02:32 PM Post #720 |
|
A Sign of Zeta
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, it didn't say they were Pokemon outright in that thread. ...wait, did it? EDIT: After looking, the folder is PKMN folder, but I think that's the only place it mentions Pokemon. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Suggestions and Questions · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:39 PM Jul 11
|