| NEWS BOX | ||
| Welcome to BEHG. We hope you enjoy your trip through our cesspool of hatred and lies. |
| Neocons and their warlike mentality can go to Hell | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 4 2007, 02:42:38 PM (907 Views) | |
| Jeff | Apr 5 2007, 11:49:26 AM Post #61 |
|
Unregistered
|
Anything that isn't a hydrocarbon. |
|
|
| Abyssal_Shrimp | Apr 5 2007, 12:16:50 PM Post #62 |
![]()
GREGOR SMASH!
![]()
|
You don't understand. The faster we go, the slower the time goes, until, when you reach the speed of light, time stops. So, if, like you said, we could theoretically find a way for something to go faster than the speed of light, then it would transcend time, and go backwards in it. Effectively travelling back in time, and not going ahead of it. But all of this is rendered rather null considering it'd probably form a black hole before reaching a pace quicker than the speed of light, because of the effect it has on the mass. |
![]() |
|
| Lord Jim | Apr 5 2007, 01:04:15 PM Post #63 |
|
There can be only one.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In theory, Einstein claims that you cannot go faster than the speed of light. Unless we somehow achieve that, we cannot know what will happen. And this conversation has taken a weird point. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Abyssal_Shrimp | Apr 5 2007, 01:22:30 PM Post #64 |
![]()
GREGOR SMASH!
![]()
|
That it did. |
![]() |
|
| F3nr1L | Apr 5 2007, 01:24:51 PM Post #65 |
|
Unregistered
|
Well then. Take my statement, and reverse most of it. We will just have to find something that couldn't become a black hole. Maybe we can find a way ti physically manifest the existence of light, and that would work.. I will find a way to get Huff's Loop Theory to work! |
|
|
| Stone Kirby | Apr 5 2007, 09:00:36 PM Post #66 |
![]()
¢¾¢Ü!?
![]()
|
There seems to be some misconception in this topic of what a neoconservative (neocon for short) actually is. Neocons are NOT the "Religious Right." The Religious Right usually supports Bush, and the Neocons have been quite prevalent in the Bush administration, but the two are fundamentally different groups. The primary emphasis (Arguably the only emphasis) of neoconservatism is on foreign policy. They believe that the U.S. should invade other countries to spread democracy (Why anyone would want to do that when confronted with the example of democracy in the U.S. is beyond me) - and they seem to think every possible political situation in a foreign country provides a reason for U.S. intervention. Neocons seem to be willing to go to extreme lengths in pursuit of their goal, including mass deception and violations of civil liberties in the name of "national security" - even though their policies of aggressive war are the cause of said possible insecurity in the first place. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Serious Business · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:57 AM Jul 11
|
Auspice Zeta created by sakuragi-kun of the ZBTZ
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy










![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)

3:57 AM Jul 11