Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Evo Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| updated ranks | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 24 2010, 08:44 PM (566 Views) | |
| DragoN[SeX] | Mar 25 2010, 10:52 PM Post #16 |
![]()
|
Grammar wise you have the level of an average 5th grade elementary school student, you have no say in the matter and you really are a dumbass and a tool. Just because you've lulled yourself into a false sense of superior intellect due to being surrounded by people on Sneaky's level doesn't actually mean you're not an idiot yourself. We had a good thing going before you decided to get out of pocket, don't make me put you in your place. |
![]() |
|
| Broke[EvX] | Mar 25 2010, 11:28 PM Post #17 |
|
Teh pwnz0r
![]()
|
No, Rampid's actually correct. The word "for" is what makes the sentence incorrect. The definition of "for" closest to the way you used it is: "used as a function word to indicate duration of time or extent of space <gone for two days>." While this is close to the way you used it, "at least 5 times" is not actually a duration as "5" is simply quantifying the word "times" which, in this sentence, refers to an event (Sneaky and I arguing). While it may be confusing due to use of the term "times" in a perfect present sense, the word is not a duration such as an hour, minute, or day. The way you used it, "5 times," is grammatically comparable to "5 things," not "5 hours." To further clarify, if someone were to ask you how long until you were going to be finished with a task, you could respond with "20 seconds/minutes/hours/days/years/etc" but not "20 times." Had you said "You've had this same argument at least 5 times" or "You've been having this same argument for at least 5 years," you would have been grammatically correct. |
![]() |
|
| Canadian | Mar 25 2010, 11:42 PM Post #18 |
|
The Predator
|
i wonder what he will say .... |
![]() |
|
| DragoN[SeX] | Mar 25 2010, 11:55 PM Post #19 |
![]()
|
Error in translation, seeing I actually speak two languages besides only one. I was translating; "Por lo menos" which is an exact translation to "For at least." Even if you were to have the most primitive level of deductive reasoning you would come to the conclusion that it was a mere error. Where others whom quite blatantly error repetitively or simply write unreasonable babble that do not even fulfill the bare minimum requirements to be considered a grammatically correct response. Then you have idiots like Poo/Ramp who think that jumping on the bandwagon makes them right, because if we all know something it's that the majority is always right, right? =P |
![]() |
|
| Rampid | Mar 26 2010, 12:24 AM Post #20 |
![]()
|
Personally I thought it was more complex irony, but I'm not on the same level as Dragon. Maybe if I typed everything in word and used the synonym tool I could babble on about how I am astute while all other inhabitants are deficient. |
![]() |
|
| Celeborn | Mar 26 2010, 01:28 AM Post #21 |
|
Fat
|
@dragon If someone observed your posts they would notice that grammatical errors tend to occur when you use less common words, long sentences and are talking about intelligence. My conclusion was your forcing this type of speech to look more intelligent but are not comfortable using it. I think doing so is kinda lame so I often point out your errors. @Broke I said nothing about evx in this thread. I often don't mention evx. I don't really dislike evx I just have conflicts with some of the clans members mainly yourself and Jerm. I didn't get along with jerm when he was in other clans either just cause I've found him annoying. I don't like how u have a tendency to try to make things evx vs whoever in issues, and to reject pretty much everything not evx in origin. |
![]() |
|
| Rampid | Mar 26 2010, 01:31 AM Post #22 |
![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| Celeborn | Mar 26 2010, 01:46 AM Post #23 |
|
Fat
|
Shhh rampid ur not supposed to point that out :(. I'll have to do a better job of directing my comments where they belong unfortunately until recently I didn't really notice how much broke turns things into an evx issue. Sadly azala pointed that one out to me. Emy and others have been claiming it but I thought that was just history, however, since azala didn't have any history he was just curious why people would want ranks ordered by % instead of elo I actually considered it. I was discussing doing both formats with him to try to make it more appealing. Its really not evx as a whole that does that. Edit: Its also kind of a habit of people in the community Broke's actions where often considered evx's, emy's actions where often considered exo's, liq's actions where often considered evo's actions. Edited by Celeborn, Mar 26 2010, 01:47 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Broke[EvX] | Mar 26 2010, 04:41 AM Post #24 |
|
Teh pwnz0r
![]()
|
What's sad is he probably had to use the synonym tool to come up with several of those words, which he used poorly. ;P
Jesus fucking Christ, you're stupid.
YOU brought EvX into this discussion and I condemned you for doing so and you've got it twisted in your tiny little mind that I turn things into an EvX issue? You can't really be this stupid...you just can't...
Azala doesn't know me. The only topics he browses on these forums are generally those about the ranks. I never mention my clan in any of those topics except when, like in this thread, some idiot like you brings us up first and assumes one of us is speaking for all of us. So either: a) Azala is stupid. He saw several people who happen to be in EvX arguing on the same side of a topic. Our members are in a clan together because we get along and often have similar views. That's how social groups work, people tend to surround themselves with somewhat like-minded individuals. To assume we're arguing on the same side of an issue because we're in the same clan, rather than we're in the same clan because our ways of thinking tend to put us on the same side of an argument is confusing cause with effect and is quite stupid on his part. b) You're stupid (this one gets my vote). You bring up EvX a lot. Despite myself and others clearly laying down a myriad of rational, logical reasons why we don't like your way of doing things, you cling to the idea that we shoot your ideas down simply because you're not EvX or because we don't like you (see the quote below). It's the same thing you complain about with the forum's administration. You probably fed this sort of crap to Azala at some point when conversing with him and he echoed it back to you.
Do you ever read? I reject a lot of ideas because, quite frankly, most of you are stupid and your ideas are bad. I criticize Rampid about the ranks all the time (or at least I did when I was more active in them). I supported your idea of putting the win streak in the thread, despite his protests. Your problem is you lack the concept of object permanence. You assume it's only ideas from you and members of other clans I shoot down and call stupid (when they rightfully are). Here's a thought: Maybe I come down on my own members about bad ideas in my channel. I mean, you suck balls but I like most of them, I generally avoid calling them out publicly when they do or come up with something stupid. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
Emy is probably the most biased, manipulative asshole who play evolves. His opinion and his word are worth nothing and anyone who's known him for a few months and aren't stupid enough to fall for his BS will agree. Point being, I call you an idiot for bringing clans into this topic and you accuse me of being the one to make everything a clan issue. Pro ass logic, Sneaky. God help us all should you ever encounter a woman with poor enough judgment to allow you the chance to reproduce. |
![]() |
|
| DragoN[SeX] | Mar 26 2010, 10:52 AM Post #25 |
![]()
|
Sneaky, there are by far less errors in any of my posts no matter of the "size" of words when compared to the shit piles you call posts. 90% of the words you use are under three syllables and I bet you check proof your posts and still fucking suck a dick at attempting to appear less stupid than you actually are. Ramp is an idiot and can just suck a dick. =P Touche Sneak, I take back my comment and will go sit in the corner, dumbass. =P |
![]() |
|
| CraZy | Mar 26 2010, 12:15 PM Post #26 |
|
Trainee
|
You're = you are Example You're a fucking idiot See you can swap "you are" in and it still works Your = Relating to you or yourself, Relating to one or oneself Example Your clan is Just as stupid By your logic, you're not comfortable with basic english |
![]() |
|
| Rampid | Mar 26 2010, 01:48 PM Post #27 |
![]()
|
That was my point.... Ever notice Dragon missuses high school vocab words? Edited by Rampid, Mar 26 2010, 01:48 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Broke[EvX] | Mar 26 2010, 03:11 PM Post #28 |
|
Teh pwnz0r
![]()
|
That was probably as much your point as it is Dragon's point when he's being "ironic" |
![]() |
|
| JuLz | Mar 26 2010, 07:48 PM Post #29 |
|
Skrillin's Bitch
|
I edited that and ME TOO ![]() Edited by JuLz, Mar 26 2010, 07:52 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Rampid | Mar 26 2010, 08:15 PM Post #30 |
![]()
|
Well maybe if you didn't have the intellect of a three-toed sloth you would have been able to realize that. Anyways, fuck you. You know that's what I meant. I hope you have a son. A beautiful son who's talented. Then I hope he has his legs taken from him. Edited by Rampid, Mar 26 2010, 08:16 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · 1v1 Rankings!! · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:46 AM Jul 11
|







3:46 AM Jul 11