| Welcome to Advanced Robot Combat. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Some discussion on the rules; because man is there some bullshit going on in ways you wouldn't expect :P | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jun 7 2016, 01:15 PM (209 Views) | |
| The_Angry_Goat | Jun 7 2016, 01:15 PM Post #1 |
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
alright so Kody's post in the FRR discussion turned into a conversation on facebook which brought up some interesting points that people seem to think need changing/improving, so I was thinking we could get the opinions of the rest of the forum on these matters. that was a long sentence . also included in my list are some popular themes for debate in the past month or so. feel free to agree/disagree/add new ideas, but have a reason for advocating for whatever it is you want, and do keep things civil ![]() -Melty-brain spinners are currently not affected by self-KO rules, according to the wording of the rules. this is quite unrealistic, and easily fix-able -Melty-brains also should have some sort of bonus, because as it is, they seem to be at a bit of a natural disadvantage in our meta. people seemed to like the thing Badnik did where they got an automatic +3 to their weapon (making it easy for them to move at about 4 speed, which is pretty reasonable). I also think that their weapon should be limited to something like 6. -currently weapon armor (and therefore self-damage), is calculated pre-bonus, meaning that designs like Papercuts can occur, where a robot has a paper-thin armor but no self KO-chance because most of its armor is in its wedge. I'm ambivalent about this, but at least one person so far has expressed distaste for it - so thoughts? -the walker bonus should be reduced, I think to either 33 or 34 -I also think that there should be some sort of limit on how many different types of weapons a robot is allowed to have. as cool as Mastodon is, it's kind of bullshit that it has three weapons systems that are almost entirely different to face. yes, it is potentially realistic (Ultimo Destructo is really three completely different robots that they could use ), but I don't like it from a strategy perspective - each design has compromises and strengths, and to simply be able to attach any design to your robot removes that part of strategy.also, sorry if I picked on your robot, I needed examples . don't take it personally, I've done some manipulation of the rules myself in ways that later encouraged fixing of rules (cough cough Glass Cannon cough cough). DISCUSS!
|
|
‽ ROBOTICS (180 - 88 lifetime) Ruination 4 Nick's Fuzzy Rules: 7-1 Glitch: 5-3 Hazardous Waste Removal: 6-2 Khnum: 4-4 ROBOT2 Hat Garage: 0-0 Lilian: 0-0 Blue Max: 0-0 Neuromancer: 0-0 "giant fucking dinosaur" is in my top 5 picks to win the nut ~V900 So you're saying no arenas that fill the driver booths with powerful hallucinogenic gas that argle bargle THE ENEMY'S GATE IS SIDEWAYS ~ Rocket III ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| scorpion1m | Jun 7 2016, 02:10 PM Post #2 |
|
the broniest robot fan
|
meltys need no more advantage has they already have the advantage of being hard to deal with and get hold of form many types of robots if a robot goes in with 8 wedge armour but 2 amour for the rest of the robot every time they get hit on the side that isn't the wedge it should be fatale walker bonbons is ok they have disadvantages to make it fair as long as people send every attachment/ weapon and there is logical then it should be ok you could say that attachments can't be higher then 2 and if they go in with a complete different weapon make it so e.g if 1 weapon alteration is a flipper and anther if a spinner they can't change there numbers between fights and can only have a maximum weapon power of 12 if they have 2 or more weapon chages |
![]() |
|
| Cha0sFerret | Jun 7 2016, 02:22 PM Post #3 |
![]()
What just appeared in my hands?
|
To add to the walker bonus reduction: maybe a slight reduction on the walker speed cap is needed. The current speed cap of 5 works just fine until we look at stuff like Defiance and compare it to similar non-walker designs. Most horizontal spinners that have a +4 weapon armor bonus have 5 speed, even with wheels. We can also see this problem with overhead spinners, which normally sit around 4 speed, walker or not. Currently I don't see any reason not to make every spinner a walker if there's no drivetrain sacrifice for the extra points. I would like to propose reducing the speed cap to 3.
Edited by Cha0sFerret, Jun 7 2016, 02:23 PM.
|
|
Robocon (3-1) Eat Me Too: 2-0 Eye of Fury: 1-1 Ruination: The Upheaval (11-5) Eat Me Too: 3-1 Lulver: 3-1 Wedgelord: 3-1 Scrunglebot: 2-2 A growing collection of fun quotes from the community
| |
![]() |
|
| Mystic2000 | Jun 7 2016, 02:28 PM Post #4 |
|
The Mad Scientist of ARC
|
honestly i'm not sure if the fact that melty don't self KO really matters, i get that it's unrealistic, but low armor and the fact that a melty is in theory easier to stop than a normal spinner means it really won't make them op, that and the fact that current melties don't even get in the self-ko range, means that the only thing gained by this change would be from a realism standpoint |
![]() Team Obscure: "From the endless pit of darkness we arise, to make sure you'll never see the next sunrise" | |
![]() |
|
| The_Angry_Goat | Jun 7 2016, 02:43 PM Post #5 |
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
From Skype: [12:29:06 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: i agree with the melty buff tho [12:29:33 PM] Martijn: I want to make a melty brain walker now [12:29:42 PM] Nick: Although I think it would need to be robots that only move by translational drift [12:30:15 PM] Nick: Otherwise you'd get a 1-point translational feature just to get the buff [12:30:25 PM] Nick: And then you have a grossly overpowered brick rammer [12:30:32 PM] Gabe!: oh yes I agree with that [12:30:39 PM] Gabe!: though what would the weapon buff go to? [12:30:51 PM] Gabe!: it'd just have a good thwacking feature as well ![]() [12:31:53 PM] Nick: Wait, is the buff only applicable to the Weapon stat? [12:32:03 PM] Nick: I thought you could stick it on any stat =P [12:32:14 PM] Nick: But I would still restrict it to pure translators [12:32:23 PM] Gabe!: no, just the weapon stat IMO [12:32:30 PM] Gabe!: do you think it should be different? [12:32:51 PM] Nick: No, I'd agree with just the weapon stat. Makes it less susceptible to abuse [12:36:15 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: also i don't see the problem with having lots of interchangable weapons [12:36:32 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: as long as the design changes to accomodate them are minimal [12:36:40 PM] Badnik96: it makes you incredibly hard to strategize for while making it incredibly easy for you to strategize against your opponent [12:36:46 PM] Badnik96: it kind of removes a large aspect of the game [12:36:47 PM] Gabe!: that's a very personal opinion for me, and I think that opinion will be incredibly varied on that one [12:36:53 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: you just add versatility to your machine [12:37:09 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: i get it that it can make a average design impossible to counter tho... [12:37:10 PM] Badnik96: I mean, interchangeable weapons are fine imo, but if you go overboard and Kiazi your robot I can see people getting angry with you [12:37:23 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: Kiazi ? [12:37:28 PM] Nick: As long as the system used to run the weapon doesn't change too much, I think it would be fine [12:37:31 PM] Brian Crotty: I like different weapon heads and armor configurations and stuff. But the ultimo destructo method of bolting the same wheels to 3 different robots is prettly lame imo [12:37:32 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: wasn't that an old member ? [12:37:52 PM] Badnik96: yeah kiazi was an old member. he's mainly known for his old MW which had about 700 different weapon attachments [12:37:55 PM] Nick: Yep, old-ass member who I think used some particularly unpleasant colour schemes [12:38:02 PM] Badnik96: mainly red and green yeah [12:38:27 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: 700 different attachements ? [12:38:37 PM | Edited 12:38:39 PM] Nick: If you have something like pneumatic flipper/axe/spike (lol), or a horizontal/vertical spinner, then I think that's fine [12:38:45 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: at this point it becomes a pain for both the builder and the opponent [12:38:55 PM] Nick: But yeah, going full Destructo is clearly bollocks [12:39:06 PM] Badnik96: it was a robot that could have either a hammer or lifter [12:39:16 PM] Badnik96: and he had about 7 or 8 different weapon ends he could stick on it [12:39:19 PM] Bradley Maier: "I start the fight by slapping the other driver across the face" [12:39:27 PM] Badnik96: I wasn't there for it but Josh was [12:39:33 PM] Gabe!: Nyx does that without much change for the internals IIRC [12:39:37 PM] Brian Crotty: Yeah that's pretty crazy [12:40:03 PM] Nick: [12:39 PM] Gabe!: <<< Nyx does that without much change for the internals IIRCI think that's the way to quantify it, myself [12:40:25 PM] Badnik96: Nyx is incredibly well done yeah [12:40:26 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: the only interchangable thing i have is Midnight Pathos s'lifter ends [12:40:35 PM] Nick: If you have to change everything except the drivetrain, then that's going too far with interchangeableness [12:40:55 PM] Brian Crotty: yeah I agree with that Nick [12:41:09 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: bot with 9001 weapon and armor setups anyone ? [12:41:24 PM] Brian Crotty: Sewer Snake modularity = Good [12:41:27 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: it's almost a Ditto in ARC form [12:41:28 PM] Nick: I think the most interchangeable things I had on one robot was 6, and I can't remember if that ever actually fought [12:41:48 PM] Brian Crotty: Bombshell modularity = Bad [12:41:57 PM] Bradley Maier: there's probably a program out there that I could use to procedurally generate 9001 variations of a part :v [12:42:10 PM] Nick: Ultimo Destructo modularity = Banned :v [12:42:22 PM] Bob, Trépasseur de l'Infernium: at some point it's just redunant tho [12:42:39 PM] Gabe!: anyone mind if I copy/paste this chat into the thread [12:42:42 PM] Brian Crotty: the No Man's Sky of robot variations [12:42:48 PM] Gabe!: because I'm gonna do it regardless :v |
|
‽ ROBOTICS (180 - 88 lifetime) Ruination 4 Nick's Fuzzy Rules: 7-1 Glitch: 5-3 Hazardous Waste Removal: 6-2 Khnum: 4-4 ROBOT2 Hat Garage: 0-0 Lilian: 0-0 Blue Max: 0-0 Neuromancer: 0-0 "giant fucking dinosaur" is in my top 5 picks to win the nut ~V900 So you're saying no arenas that fill the driver booths with powerful hallucinogenic gas that argle bargle THE ENEMY'S GATE IS SIDEWAYS ~ Rocket III ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Hooray For Lexan | Jun 7 2016, 04:53 PM Post #6 |
|
Heavyweight
|
All right. I think that the way to balance melties is to compare their performance to a ring spinner, and to real-life melties. So, let's consider a ring spinner with 4 speed, 2 traction, 1 torque, 15 weapon, and 8 armor (10 weapon armor). This robot spins up pretty quickly, the drivetrain is fully effective with the weapon at low speed, and it has 10 weapon armor. An equivalent melty would have 1 weapon -> 4 translational speed, 2 traction, 1 torque, 15 speed -> 15 weapon, and can go up to 11 armor. The melty is a little sturdier, but in practice it'll need to take a point or two out of speed and put it into traction. It's not terrible balance-wise, but what about realism? First of all, a limit of 6 translational speed is insane. That's equivalent to the faster spinners. Each point of speed in ARC seems to be equivalent to around 2-3 MPH of top speed based on how fast robots actually move, and a melty translating that quickly is ridiculous: IRL I don't think there's a single melty that can exceed walking pace. A realistic maximum is a translational speed of 3, with no bonus. Second: melties IRL don't seem to spin up that much slower than a shell spinner, but have a tendency to hockey-puck around the arena to a degree not seen in other spinners. I think the best way to simulate this would be to make spinup independent of traction just like a normal spinner, but the distance melties launch themselves away in an impact should be increased to (weapon - traction), vs. (weapon - traction)/2 for a normal spinner. If you want spinup to be traction-dependent, do something like add a +3 bonus to the effective traction score for purposes of determining spinup time. Under these rules, I could build a ring spinner with the same speed as a melty, with stats: 3 speed, 2 traction, 1 torque, 15 weapon, 9 armor (11 weapon armor). An equivalent melty could have a reasonable spinup at the expense of throwing itself around the arena. However, it would have only 9 weapon armor, which is really weak. IMO melties still need to at least have a bonus to their teeth to be competitive.
Ehh, having a sturdy weapon and a sturdy internal structure holding it together, a shock-mounted wedge, but really shitty paper-thin armor on the rest of the robot isn't really unrealistic, and honestly the strategy isn't that good. The only time Papercuts's non-weapon armor was relevant it lost (although Vorpal Bunny being a silly design might've had something to do with that), and that was at Bot-O-Rama. Pulling that in any other tournament is basically begging to be one-shotted by hazards. It's definitely not OP. However, I do think it's a good idea to ban applying armor bonuses to robots where most of the hittable surface area already receives a weapon armor bonus. Overheads ought to be okay, but a shell or ring spinner doing it is just silly.
I agree: IMO 34 should be fine.
I have an idea: to account for the fact that the weapon must be build around an interchangeable pod instead of being integral to the robot structure, for every alternate weapon configuration a robot can have which is radically different in function (i.e. not something like a hammer head with a different shape, or Sewer Snake style forks vs. an anti-spinner plow), the power of ALL the configurations must be reduced by one. Mastodon would have all its weapons' power reduced by 2.
As someone who built a walker in an attempt to make a weapon type that's ordinarily not viable actually useful (i.e. crushers), please no. With a cap of 3 speed, the ONLY viable weapon for a walker is either a shell or overhead spinner, or something with a turret. One other thing that might be workable is implementing a hard cap to the power of certain weapons (e.g. hammers have a limit of 14, spinners have a limit of 17). This is realistically explainable as an event not wanting robots powerful enough to punch giant holes in the floor or fling shrapnel through the walls. |
|
"you can give a fuck, just don't give too much of a fuck. there's an optimal level of fuckiness, and if you exceed your fuck quota you'll burn out." - BEES Trihunter on V900's New Undercutter: Spoiler: click to toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| The_Angry_Goat | Jun 7 2016, 05:36 PM Post #7 |
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
as a counter-argument to a lot of your ideas about melties, may I present Scary-go-Round? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKol3MhsvvU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SGAsh7C6AU it translates quite quickly, doesn't experience a lot of knockback, and spins at a comparitively low RPM. |
|
‽ ROBOTICS (180 - 88 lifetime) Ruination 4 Nick's Fuzzy Rules: 7-1 Glitch: 5-3 Hazardous Waste Removal: 6-2 Khnum: 4-4 ROBOT2 Hat Garage: 0-0 Lilian: 0-0 Blue Max: 0-0 Neuromancer: 0-0 "giant fucking dinosaur" is in my top 5 picks to win the nut ~V900 So you're saying no arenas that fill the driver booths with powerful hallucinogenic gas that argle bargle THE ENEMY'S GATE IS SIDEWAYS ~ Rocket III ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Badnik96 | Jun 7 2016, 06:18 PM Post #8 |
![]()
You're just a voice pal, you don't know a damn thing about racing!
|
Okay how about this instead. Total weapon and speed for melty-brain spinners cannot exceed 18. This allows for decent balance while also being realistic. (we had a similar rule like this back in the days of the Wedge stat where wedge and armor couldn't exceed a certain number, so there is precedent for this) Also I would agree with the tooth bonus as weapon armor for melty-brains, perhaps make it only 2 to keep it balanced. I like HDIT's idea about melty brain traction as well. That sounds pretty nice. This would allow for: Speed: 14 Weapon: 3 Armor: 9 (+2 to the teeth due to weapon armor) Traction: 4 Torque: 1 which seems decently equivalent to most of the shell spinners, though a little less maneuverable. Honestly, a walker bonus of 34 still seems a little high for me. 33 sounds about right. |
|
Team Ignition WhipCoil - The Crash & Burn Tournament 5 Champion Redline - Robot Bastards LW Champion Sling Shot - Bot-o-Rama 2016 Sportsman Champion The Debilitator - Cherry Bomb Classic Lightweight Champion Pyrite - FRR Backlash Lightweight Champion Doomerang - Robot Fight Night Heavyweight Champion [/color]
| |
![]() |
|
| Badnik96 | Jun 7 2016, 06:25 PM Post #9 |
![]()
You're just a voice pal, you don't know a damn thing about racing!
|
Hey while we're here, do we want to discuss adding a damage scale for cutting weapons like saws etc? Between my use of Tesla's Revenge and some of the robots on this season of BB I expect them to be getting a little more popular in the near future. |
|
Team Ignition WhipCoil - The Crash & Burn Tournament 5 Champion Redline - Robot Bastards LW Champion Sling Shot - Bot-o-Rama 2016 Sportsman Champion The Debilitator - Cherry Bomb Classic Lightweight Champion Pyrite - FRR Backlash Lightweight Champion Doomerang - Robot Fight Night Heavyweight Champion [/color]
| |
![]() |
|
| The_Angry_Goat | Jun 7 2016, 06:27 PM Post #10 |
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
the slight loss of manueverability would be countered by their ability to move omni-directionally, though due to the melty-brain programming.
I'd like to see something where the weapon-armor difference has to do with the amount of time it takes to cut through the armor, though I'm not entirely sure how that would pan out Edited by The_Angry_Goat, Jun 7 2016, 06:29 PM.
|
|
‽ ROBOTICS (180 - 88 lifetime) Ruination 4 Nick's Fuzzy Rules: 7-1 Glitch: 5-3 Hazardous Waste Removal: 6-2 Khnum: 4-4 ROBOT2 Hat Garage: 0-0 Lilian: 0-0 Blue Max: 0-0 Neuromancer: 0-0 "giant fucking dinosaur" is in my top 5 picks to win the nut ~V900 So you're saying no arenas that fill the driver booths with powerful hallucinogenic gas that argle bargle THE ENEMY'S GATE IS SIDEWAYS ~ Rocket III ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Hooray For Lexan | Jun 7 2016, 10:21 PM Post #11 |
|
Heavyweight
|
It's still not translating more than maybe 2-3 feet per second. Also, you could easily make Scary-Go-Round suffer almost no knockback by making its traction equal or exceed its speed (effectively weapon) score - which is quite reasonable because its rotational speed, and hence weapon power, is as you said really low.
That sounds reasonable, but unnecessary. Charybdis has a combined speed/weapon score of 18, and I would never go higher than that because doing so would require huge sacrifices in armor and traction. Blazing around the arena at 5 speed isn't that useful if you only have 9 weapon armor and can get ripped open by a midcutter that also has 5 speed.
True, but right now there's nothing stopping you from putting omni wheels or swerve drive on your shell spinner.
I created a cutting weapon damage scale for Bot-O-Rama; this could be a starting point. I figure they should function somewhat like hammers where they treat everything like a corner, but require a couple seconds of contact to cause serious damage. 6G: Cutting weapons, including saws, drills, and chainsaws, are governed by the following rules: i: a single-degree of freedom "arm" holding a cutting weapon only requires 1 weapon power to function. ii: cutting weapons do NOT receive any weapon armor bonus regardless of their power. high-hardness sawblades are fragile: treat them with care. iii: damage is dealt according to the following rules: Flat Surface Damage - 0 - No damage: The saw or drill skitters over the armor or is stopped by it. 1 - Minor Damage: The saw or drill scrapes over the armor and stops without penetrating fully. No chance of a knockout. 2 - Average Damage: The saw or drill creates a small hole or shallow cut after extended contact with the same spot. 3 - Significant Damage: A significant cut is formed. Wheels may have their treads shredded or ripped off, compromising their function, and exposed belts or chains may be severed. 4 - Major Damage: Deep cuts are formed, with repeated attacks compromising the integrity of armor and allowing internal components to be damaged. 5+ - Catastrophic Damage: Every attack threatens a knockout due to internal damage. Armor will be severely cut, and structural members may be cut through. |
|
"you can give a fuck, just don't give too much of a fuck. there's an optimal level of fuckiness, and if you exceed your fuck quota you'll burn out." - BEES Trihunter on V900's New Undercutter: Spoiler: click to toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| The Monsterworks | Jul 8 2016, 03:55 AM Post #12 |
|
Ridiculum et Terribilis
|
So, with regards to melty-fbs hybrids, they're potentially problematic in terms of the rules, so I propose the following: Having them subject to the multi-weapon rule is ridiculous, since a drivetrain is fundamentally not an active weapon, though it can be used in a similar way. While I was hoping to avoid having to say this, the real weakness of the melty-fbs system is the fact that it might be able to move with 8 speed while driving normally, but once it engages its melty drive, there's no realistic way that it'd be able to translate that quickly. Therefore, I'd propose something like a 50% movement penalty while a melty-fbs is translating. Basically, it translates with half of its speed stat. Hell, maybe even 1/4. Furthermore, there was discussion about buffing melties before the whole melty-fbs debate. Instead of having their weapon power count for speed, which is just dumb, why not have their translating speed just equal 1/4 of their actual speed stat. That way they get a few free points to throw into traction or another stat and they won't be at a disadvantage in the meta. Edited by The Monsterworks, Jul 8 2016, 09:35 AM.
|
|
Wins: a bunch Losses: more every week! Mastodon (Extinction) || Osiris (Armageddon!) || Elrathia (ROBOTS) | |
![]() |
|
| Mystic2000 | Jul 8 2016, 04:10 AM Post #13 |
|
The Mad Scientist of ARC
|
makes sense and also creates a weakness to fast bots while spinning up... maybe now people won't require nerfs on this |
![]() Team Obscure: "From the endless pit of darkness we arise, to make sure you'll never see the next sunrise" | |
![]() |
|
| Wolf51-50 | Jul 8 2016, 11:34 AM Post #14 |
![]()
HmmmmMMMMMMM......
|
I'm not to sure about melties, but I might be able to cover some thing on the other topics. What if Swiss army bots could have a limit of two moving weapons, but are limited by types. Spinners are limited to two weapons, wedges and lifters are limited to three, but it must be a design for their type (Ex: you wouldn't see Sewer Snake with a pneumatic flipper or a spinning blade would you?). For hammerbots, they are limited to two and can only have either a lifter, a plow, or a different type of hammer depending on how the rules play out (I think we can work from here on more exotic designs like crushers). And I think it would be ok to have the walker bonus be 34. |
|
Alpha Robotics- Embrace the Carnage! Upcoming tournaments Reckoning: Revival Vovoka 0-0 (Lifetime 6-2) Current Tournaments: Ruination 4: The Upheaval LW: White Lightning 0-2 (Lifetime 3-5) MW: Diablo Genesis 0-2(Lifetime 5-2) HW: Coup de Grâce 1-1 (Lifetime 12-4)[currently reining HW CHAMPION] SHW: Fenrir 2-0 (Lifetime 2-1) "hey, that's my underground sex dungeon, not yours!" - The_Angry_Goat | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." |
|
| « Previous Topic · Fantasy All Access · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
9:24 AM Jul 11
|



. also included in my list are some popular themes for debate in the past month or so. feel free to agree/disagree/add new ideas, but have a reason for advocating for whatever it is you want, and do keep things civil 







[/color]


9:24 AM Jul 11