| Welcome to the Dorset Japanese Old Crew. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you had membership on the Original DJCC Forum then that account should still be active on this forum and you can log in below using your old username & password. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Number Plates; MOT Requirements | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 26 2008, 10:42 PM (447 Views) | |
| cisco | Feb 26 2008, 10:42 PM Post #1 |
Flat4x4xFar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There has been some posts on non conforming number plates recently so I thought would try to clear up a few questions by posting the Method Of Inspection and Reasons For Rejection section of the Testers guide. This is the up to date info that we use to test number plates. There is also a special notice on the last picture dated 10 - 2007 This suspends certain checks for the time being but will be replaced by new requirements shortly Our cars fall into the class 4 (IV) sections I cant get a digital file off the Vosa computer so have had to print and scan Hope you find this useful ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
[GK-customfield]Manny[customfield-GK]
| |
![]() |
|
| Andy | Feb 26 2008, 11:20 PM Post #2 |
|
Unregistered
|
Thanks for posting that manny, i'll make it a sticky so we have no more questions
|
|
|
| Brad | Feb 26 2008, 11:53 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Detailing Machine
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Manny I read this on another forum recently... any ideas if its true? MOT number plate rules suspended -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The recent changes to to MOT rules on number plates has been suspended meaning testers cannot fail a car on. The registration plate back ground overprinted with text e.g. vehicle manufacturer name. ------------------------------------------------------------------- A front plate does not have black characters on a white background ------------------------------------------------------------------- A rear plate does not have black characters on a yellow background ------------------------------------------------------------------- A reg plate not showing the name and postcode of the supplying outlet -------------------------------------------------------------------- Plate not showing a BSAU 145d marking -------------------------------------- A plate showing a honeycomb or similar background ----------------------------------------------------- A plate with a non reflective boarder obviously wider than permitted or too close to the characters ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A dual purpose plate displaying a symbol other than an acceptable symbol or flag. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The new rules will continue once cleared, so for now the car cannot be failed on the above points This was reported in a Professional Trade Magazine Reasoning behind it.. Basically before a law can be passed as enforceable you must follow the appropriate procedures and some IDIOT at the government or DVLA to be precise forgot to do this. Its a technical oversight which they are trying to remedy a the moment but it takes time. |
|
<a href=http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v67/BradB/Car%20Detailing/?start=all><img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v67/BradB/signature3.jpg /></a> Adding power makes you faster on the straights; adding lightness makes you faster everywhere Local Car Detailer | |
![]() |
|
| cisco | Feb 26 2008, 11:57 PM Post #4 |
Flat4x4xFar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes thats true Brad see the Special notice above, it will change in time but the other points do still apply |
[GK-customfield]Manny[customfield-GK]
| |
![]() |
|
| Brad | Feb 26 2008, 11:59 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Detailing Machine
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ah cool, missed that bit |
|
<a href=http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v67/BradB/Car%20Detailing/?start=all><img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v67/BradB/signature3.jpg /></a> Adding power makes you faster on the straights; adding lightness makes you faster everywhere Local Car Detailer | |
![]() |
|
| 20vLevin | Feb 27 2008, 12:03 AM Post #6 |
Doesn't have a home to go to!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ooh, but are there one set of rules for the police and one for the MOT testers? |
|
AE111 BZG 164.5BHP Open Throttle Bodies, Hks Racing Manifold, Decat, Kakimoto Cat Back, Sun HT Leads, Tein Coilovers, Trd Rad Cap and Air Diversion Plate Soon to be added Tom's lightend Flywheel. www.levinoc.com | |
![]() |
|
| cisco | Feb 27 2008, 12:09 AM Post #7 |
Flat4x4xFar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In theory it should be the same as we can only test what is laid down in the testers guide and pass or fail accordingly in the relevent sections. We issue a pass stating that the car is in a roadworthy condition and conforms to regulation, I cant see the police arguing with our decision unless we have got it wrong. |
[GK-customfield]Manny[customfield-GK]
| |
![]() |
|
| Andy | Feb 27 2008, 01:33 AM Post #8 |
|
Unregistered
|
surely the MOT/DVLA sets the standard, and the police just reinforce it? if that wasn't the case then the MOT would be dictated by what the police deem acceptable on the roads, which lets face it would be alot different to the current MOT system. |
|
|
| cisco | Feb 27 2008, 01:54 AM Post #9 |
Flat4x4xFar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The MOT is based on the Road Traffic Act and its various versions over the years, in effect its the LAW covering motor vehicles in the UK The confusion sometimes comes about when non traffic trained police try to check things like tyres and number plates without actually knowing the regulations or having, for example, a tyre depth gauge to accuratly measure the central three quarters of the tread to a minimum limit of 1.6mm, looking at it and shaking your head while writing out a penalty notice is not the way to do it |
[GK-customfield]Manny[customfield-GK]
| |
![]() |
|
| amnesia | Feb 27 2008, 10:12 AM Post #10 |
There's no replacement for displacement !
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So nothing about it not being upside down ??![]() |
| [GK-customfield]Daniel[customfield-GK]If you're good at something, never do it for free... | |
![]() |
|
| cisco | Feb 27 2008, 12:49 PM Post #11 |
Flat4x4xFar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No direct mention but under "likely to be misread" section is good enough for me
|
[GK-customfield]Manny[customfield-GK]
| |
![]() |
|
| sammi | Feb 27 2008, 04:36 PM Post #12 |
Doesn't have a home to go to!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i got pulled over friday by a traffic cop after he follwed me for about 4 miles and intimideted me by sittin on my arse and i didnt react! he said that he had pulled me because my standered square number plate on the rear of my car was illigal. When i asked why he said it had to be a rectangle! I called vosa and dvla and they said its totally legal so he was talkin out of his arse! the traffic cop is now bein looked into! |
| [GK-customfield]sammi [customfield-GK] | |
![]() |
|
| paullen | Feb 27 2008, 08:11 PM Post #13 |
|
Paul Lennox
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() Gone is the 200, New project...1987 L200 www.lennoxservices.co.uk | |
![]() |
|
| cisco | Feb 27 2008, 08:30 PM Post #14 |
Flat4x4xFar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Looks like a square number plate to me ![]() As long as the font and spacing is correct and is illuminated correctly there is no reason to get pulled for a square plate |
[GK-customfield]Manny[customfield-GK]
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Other Marques: Technical Questions & Info · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)














8:03 PM Jul 11