Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
(!) This board is no longer active please join us in the new '07 CWC: http://w11.zetaboards.com/cwc2007/

Viewing Single Post From: Topics on this forum
Member Avatar

December 5 2010, 01:51 AM
December 5 2010, 01:48 AM
December 5 2010, 01:38 AM
December 5 2010, 01:27 AM
December 5 2010, 01:08 AM
Because if you wern't spreading it, you wouldn't of posted it on here.
If it wasn't shit it would of been true.
If i were stupid i wouldn't be Staff.
A Staff member has rules & guidelines to follow all Staff members follow these differently.
I've never locked a topic just because i didn't like it.
Deleting spam is part of the role.

If your going to post something make sure what you post about someone is FACT not RUMOUR, i am refering to the thread i deleted everyones post on and took "2 hours" to reply to. Surly a thread accusing a staff member of hacking someone would need to be a fact?

& Surly if you thought it was a FACT, you would of pm'd Nasir not posted it...?
Yes and you're supposed to follow them to same way you don't give a 2 week ban on 30% warning read the guidelines.
False/Effort to go through a list a topics to find a locked 1 for a bullshit reason
False/Having a discussion about Pings and you deleted the topic because I included the word "nignog" and you found that to be racial slur which could've easily been edited out or asked to be removed OR just maybe added to the filter list (which we have no longer)

Just because your a Staff member doesn't mean it still isn't true, I got a pretty legit reputation yet I come home from school 1 day and all of a sudden I 'hacked' Mannie yet no proof was provided so that would be more of an example of a rumor. Considering he provided quite a bit of evidence its possibly a fact. (Also the Hostmask was a British one hmm..)

And yes I did plan to PM Nasir w/ this as well but quite a few people told me to take it to CWC cause I'm sure people wouldn't want someone who hacks others to represent them in any shape or form whatsoever.

Like the saying goes brah brah innocent till proven guilty even though he has quite a bit of evidence you could still be innocent right? But you seem quite a bit defensive about the whole thing don't see why you just wouldn't let it go if you got nothing to worry about.
People get bans/warnings depending on how serious their offense is, this is not hard to understand i'm sure.

The rest is your own opinions & i couldn't care about most of it.

But you might want to click this, It's the population of the UK.
Ok so G was flaming along with Noel And Totti in the same thread Noel and Totti get 1 day and G gets 14 days? Even with 30% warning the max would've been like 5.

If you don't care why are you staff? Let someone who wants to make changes to the community overtake your spot then carelessness isn't helping us out at all.

Your population map helps how..?
I have no idea how G got into this conversation but alright i will discuss G, his offense was not given by me. Ask him yourself. I gave no warnings on all 3, Totti, Noel or G.

Trying to point out the fact that there are many people in CWC with british hostmasks.

My TS: ts.firesongs.co.uk:9170
My Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/F1R3S0NG5

Posted Image
Here for BurstNet High Quality Server Services
Offline Profile
Topics on this forum · Feedback
Recently active topics:Topic starters: