| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Theologians | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sunday, 17. January 2010, 01:59 (630 Views) | |
| Rose of York | Sunday, 17. January 2010, 01:59 Post #1 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Instruction on the ecclesial vocation of the theologian What exactly do theologians do, and how do they do it? The Church has the fullness of truth. Do theologians seek more truth? |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| PJD | Sunday, 17. January 2010, 10:25 Post #2 |
|
"Do theologians seek more truth?" Rose: Since being snowed in for a while and having for a time to enlarge text so as to read it more efficiently, I printed out the Catholic Encyclopaedia text relating to Dogmatic Theology and started reading it. Haven't finished yet, but early in the text is the following statement/or opinion if you wish. It does provide you with the answer i.e. 'yes they do seek more truth' - more precisely an improvement in methods of explaining basic dogmatic truths - (not inventing more). I thought you would be interested. "But since the Aristotelo-scholastic philosophy also is capable of continual development, there is reason to expect for the future a progressive improvement of speculative theology" PJD |
![]() |
|
| Anne-Marie | Sunday, 17. January 2010, 10:43 Post #3 |
|
Speculative being, of course, the operative word. Because they have not got any more of a clue than the rest of us! |
|
Anne-Marie FIAT VOLUNTAS DEI | |
![]() |
|
| PJD | Sunday, 17. January 2010, 10:56 Post #4 |
|
Point taken as you have just indicated immediately above Anne-Marie. But even scientists have to speculate before advancing. PJD |
![]() |
|
| Ned | Monday, 18. January 2010, 12:49 Post #5 |
|
Hi Rose, I've just copied this from that Vatican document you quoted: "In this way, it aims to serve the growth in understanding of the truth (cf. Col 1:10) which ushers us into that freedom which Christ lied and rose to win for us (cf. Gal 5:1)." Why should it be me that spots that? How closely do other people read these documents? Do people even take these things seriously? Is this some Vatican smart-alec's idea of a joke? Regards Ned |
![]() |
|
| Anne-Marie | Monday, 18. January 2010, 14:14 Post #6 |
|
Oh help! Perhaps you should email the Papal nuncio about it, fast? The moment some smart alec picks up on this, it really won't be funny. |
|
Anne-Marie FIAT VOLUNTAS DEI | |
![]() |
|
| Ned | Monday, 18. January 2010, 15:42 Post #7 |
|
I don't have that email address, Anne-Marie, but I know someone who does, and I've emailed him. I hope something gets done. I don't have much hope it will be done soon. On the 20th March last year I emailed a bishop pointing out the unfortunate phrase 'TRIBUTE OF THE HOLY FATHER TO THE STATUE OF MARY IMMACULATE CONCEPTION' on the Vatican website. It's still there. And there are anti-Catholic websites using that to demonstrate us as idol-worshippers. |
![]() |
|
| Joseph | Monday, 18. January 2010, 18:02 Post #8 |
|
None of us are perfect are we? Not even the Vatican
|
|
Joseph | |
![]() |
|
| PJD | Monday, 18. January 2010, 22:31 Post #9 |
|
"None of us are perfect are we? " Very true Joseph. Especially I suspect - paid lay translators. PJD |
![]() |
|
| Anne-Marie | Monday, 18. January 2010, 23:08 Post #10 |
|
Are you refering to them not understanding the difference twixt singular and plural?
|
|
Anne-Marie FIAT VOLUNTAS DEI | |
![]() |
|
| Joseph | Monday, 18. January 2010, 23:40 Post #11 |
|
Pedant!
|
|
Joseph | |
![]() |
|
| Derekap | Tuesday, 19. January 2010, 16:27 Post #12 |
|
Can we therefore assume that if everything was in Latin alone, and not translated, there would never be any mistakes?
Edited by Derekap, Tuesday, 19. January 2010, 16:27.
|
| Derekap | |
![]() |
|
| James | Tuesday, 19. January 2010, 16:53 Post #13 |
|
James
|
Freudian slip - no doubt. : http://www.answers.com/topic/freudian-slip- Edited by James, Tuesday, 19. January 2010, 17:00.
|
![]() |
|
| SeanJ | Wednesday, 20. January 2010, 00:21 Post #14 |
|
Administrator
|
The Latin Vulgate Bible on the Vatican's web site has numerous typos. |
![]() |
|
| PJD | Wednesday, 20. January 2010, 14:53 Post #15 |
|
The other day I questioned a priest, who taught dogmatic theology etc., about the academic acceptability of those who put letters after their name. He replied that in respect of Catholic examinations etc. all courses were set out by the Catholic Hierarchy, exam papers were prepared by Catholic theologians, they were passed by Catholic theologians, and they had to have proceeded via a Catholic University, staffed by Catholics, and recognised by the Vatican. He asked me why I was asking. I said that nowadays one had to 'keep awake'. He smiled. PJD |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Catholic Discussion · Next Topic » |







3:43 PM Jul 11