| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Union For Priests | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Thursday, 29. July 2010, 01:10 (347 Views) | |
| Anne-Marie | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 12:29 Post #16 |
|
I've read Rose's post giving detaiuls of the aims... and I've also read Peter's interpretation of them. I can see nothing intrinsically wrong or unacceptable about the aims, and the wish to implement the Teaching of Vat2. If the full inclusion of women does mean women priests, personally I would have no problem were that to ever happen. If the sexuality reference is an acknowledgement that any sin of that nature is neither intrinsically less or greater than any other sin, then it seems an entirely reasonable statement (and we really are rather more obsessed with sexual sins than with any other kind!). As for each of us being equal members, well isn't that exactly what Jesus Himself told us? The fact we each have our own role to fill with our own skills and competences, doesn't have to mean women should clean silently, while men exercise real power and kick us around! Our rather important leaders should actually be our servants, according to that Jesus guy! I have no idea where, if anywhere, the union might go, but I'm sure not going to lose my cool about them or put words in their mouths. |
|
Anne-Marie FIAT VOLUNTAS DEI | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 13:02 Post #17 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
Erm,
Sounds like women priests to me!
Sexual sins are worse than plenty of other sins (not all, but they are worse than some and less bad than others). And all sexual sins are mortal. Even impure thoughts.
Only as far as people who don't like what the Church has to say are concerned. If people just obeyed (or at least tried to obey) these teachings rather than railing against them all the time, perhaps the Church wouldn't have to keep reminding people of the sinfulness of these things. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Gerard | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 13:45 Post #18 |
|
Or, alternatively giving nuns a bit more recognition, a bit more of a role, a bit more of a say ?? Gerry |
| "The institutional and charismatic aspects are quasi coessential to the Church's constitution" (Pope John Paul II, 1998). | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 14:28 Post #19 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
A lot of celibate women... |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 14:38 Post #20 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Why nuns in particular? |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| tomais | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 15:43 Post #21 |
|
I recall,and of course I paraphrase-some are more equal than others. Should such an organisation come into irish being then considering the over all structure of the Church- I would be eagerly looking forward,as a pew kneeler, to scanning over their minutes. Omagine the laiety going on down along this meandering via- where would it all lead to? Protestantism ? Mind you nothing essentially wrong with that is there? You ladies could then all join in and,and be welcomed! Tom |
![]() |
|
| Gerard | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 16:17 Post #22 |
|
To suggest that women priests are not the only answer to certain demands and/or aims that get written down. Gerry |
| "The institutional and charismatic aspects are quasi coessential to the Church's constitution" (Pope John Paul II, 1998). | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 17:14 Post #23 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Gerry, entire faith community. We have lots of single, married, separated and widowed who are free and willing to offer their the gifts, wisdom and expertise. Come to think of it, one could say the same about Catholic lay men. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Gerard | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 18:23 Post #24 |
|
Yes I agree Rose, I was trying to counter the immediate jump in eary posters to the conclusion that the aims meand women priests. Gerry |
| "The institutional and charismatic aspects are quasi coessential to the Church's constitution" (Pope John Paul II, 1998). | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 19:05 Post #25 |
![]()
Administrator
|
I know nothing about the priests who are setting up this new organisation, but I must say it is good to hear of priests who recognise women have a part to play. What percentage of activity in a parish or diocese, needs an ordained man? |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| PJD | Thursday, 5. August 2010, 20:15 Post #26 |
|
"Sexual sins are worse than plenty of other sins (not all, but they are worse than some and less bad than others). And all sexual sins are mortal. Even impure thoughts." I think we should be careful here Clare. Impure thoughts are only sinful if dwelt upon and/or no resistence offered. As for those sins that are worse, one area of which are those which come from the intellect; as distinct from those that relate to the passions [C.S.Lewis]. PJD |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Archived Discussions · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2







7:54 PM Jul 11