| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Blogging and the Church | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Thursday, 14. February 2008, 16:05 (1,749 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Sunday, 18. May 2008, 12:58 Post #31 |
|
Deleted User
|
I came across a brilliant blog, written by a Catholic quadriplegic "A blog where issues concerning people with disabilities intersect with observations about life, encouraging prayerful efforts toward social justice and inclusion of people with disabilities" Wheelie Catholic I commend it to the house KatyA |
|
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 18. May 2008, 22:34 Post #32 |
![]()
Administrator
|
I found a directory of Catholic Blogs, hundreds of them. http://catholicblogs.blogspot.com/ |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Monday, 2. June 2008, 21:32 Post #33 |
![]()
Administrator
|
A parish with a blog could help parishioners maintain some contact between Sundays. People who cannot get to Mass at all, could keep in touch. The problem I see is that if all parishioners were free to post, people who have an axe to grind could upset people. A parish forum could announce births, marriages, deaths, and if an event was cancelled, people could be notified. There could be a column about local events (not Catholic ones) to encourage people to get involved in the wider community. RCIA could have its own spot. The possibilities are many (not endless, that would make them eternal!). Does anybody know of parishes that have tried this? |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Phil_sfo | Wednesday, 4. June 2008, 19:04 Post #34 |
|
We set up a web site for our parish last year. I still don't have the proper address. It can't be found by Google - but I've just found out who is now completing the set-up. HOWEVER....... not too many people are interested I understand which seems a shame as there is a local website for the village which is probably one of the largest one in central Scotland. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Wednesday, 4. June 2008, 19:17 Post #35 |
|
Deleted User
|
It would be a good idea to ask the local website to include a link to the parish site. Our parish website took a while to become established but it improved when the url was included in the weekly newsletter. (That took a direct approach to the PP, circumventing the green cardigans) KatyA |
|
|
| Rose of York | Wednesday, 4. June 2008, 21:19 Post #36 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Phil some of the parishioners may not be interested, so they think nobody else is. Have you tried telling them that a website may be the only way some sick people and carers can keep up to date with what is happening? I suggested a newsletter be placed in the glass door of our church, for the benefit of people unable to get to Mass on a particular Sunday, but able to get into town during the week. The answer was "If they can get into town during the week, they can get into town to attend Mass, and collect a newsletter when they are there. If they are housebound, the Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion takes them a newsletter." I could not get it into their heads that a shift worker may be working during the only Mass, or a person may be sick, has a private reason for not being visited by an Extraordinary Minister, but the carer might be free to go into town one day during the week. A website is very useful to people in those or similar situations. The truth is some people do not like new ideas. If those who "do everything" do not know how to set up and run a website, they might not like letting new blood in! Every week I look at the website of the parish where I grew up and still have family connections. I keep up to date with "pastoral reorganisation" in that area and occasionally read of births, marriages and deaths in families whom I know. That gives me an opportunity to contact them, if appropriate. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Derekap | Wednesday, 4. June 2008, 22:12 Post #37 |
|
I don't approve of a "free for all" parish blog. I think it would be too tempting for ladies with green cardigans and men with green jumpers (like me) to hog it with their personal views and activities. I realise that for practical and human reasons the situation of practical church information is a bit chaotic having grown up like topsy turvy. First of all there should an overal directory of diocese and parishes, like the book version which is, or used to be, published. This could refer to a parish website updated weekly like the paper bulletin. The most important elements are accuracy, being kept up to date and clearly set out. Some are a work of art which would make Rembrandt envious but not updated or even if they are, not easy to browse. Some give the address of the Presbytery but don't tell you that the actual church is in another street! When I first wished to find some information about St Anselm's Church situated in Kingsway London, very close to Holborn Undergound Station, I eventually discovered it is supposed to be in Lincoln's Inn Fields a little distance away! I only quote this as an example of many I have come across. Certainly a parish website can be very helpful to visitors and parishioners unable to attend either a particular week (maybe holiday or sickness or work) or longer peiods for whatever reason. Like Rose I refer to the available websites in my native city in order to keep up with events. Obviously there could be a "Stop Press" section included for interim announcements, though it is unlikely many would refer to it daily. Edited by Derekap, Wednesday, 4. June 2008, 22:14.
|
| Derekap | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Wednesday, 4. June 2008, 22:41 Post #38 |
![]()
Administrator
|
The solution would be to have a parish internet forum in which no post appeared until approved. The moderator would be a lady of the Guild of the Green Cardigan. Contributions with which she disagreed would be vetoed. Posts made by fellow members of the Guild would, naturally, be automatically approved. Seriously, though, it could be a dangerous idea. It could be used by people with bad intentions, publicly posting comments that would damage the reputations of the parish priest or individual parishioners, or leading to friction within the community. Who could prevent persons joining, who may or not be Catholics, and have an axe to grind? |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Phil_sfo | Friday, 6. June 2008, 00:48 Post #39 |
|
I think I'll take your advice KatyA and Rose, and become involved in the web site. The local village site might not be too keen on me as I complained recently and had them remove some jokes with graphics that were obscene. However, it's a good idea to have such a link and I'll have a chat with the chap in charge of the parish site to see how it can be best utilised. Thank you. |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Friday, 6. June 2008, 00:55 Post #40 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Phil could it be that the people who think nobody will be interested in a parish website take that attitude because they have time to spend a lot of time at church, so always know what is going on? It could be they do not appreciate that people who can only get to the church once a week, would benefit from a website. May I make a suggestion? How about a parish website having a section headed "Help wanted please". I have a problem, in that at the little chapel I attend, everything that is done has been done by the same people for years. When one of them needs a hand with anything, they phone their pals (the same little group all the time). It could be that they are unaware that those people who "are not interested in being involved" would volunteer, if they knew what help is needed. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Monday, 14. July 2008, 19:25 Post #41 |
|
Deleted User
|
Fr Finigan draws attention to Gerald Warner's Telegraph blog where he writes about cappaphobia. I think it will amuse quite a few
Gerald Warner KatyA |
|
|
| Deleted User | Monday, 14. July 2008, 19:40 Post #42 |
|
Deleted User
|
At the risk of drawing attention away from Gerald Warner's musings, I thought this entry by Fr Sean Finnegan on his blog was rather more important. Could it be that the bishops, both here and in USA want to censor "Priest's Blogs"?
Valle Adurni KatyA |
|
|
| Rose of York | Monday, 14. July 2008, 20:20 Post #43 |
![]()
Administrator
|
The English bishops don't censor priest's blogs, because they have worked out that the internet is a huge piece of mesh attached to two fishing trawlers in the North Sea. Nice, harmless old chaps aren't they? |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Derekap | Monday, 14. July 2008, 22:10 Post #44 |
|
I stray from the point a little but.... Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos seems to suffer from various presentations of his name even within the same context of an article. Either his full name is used or Cardinal Castrillon or Cardinal Hoyos is used, or two or the three versions are used. At first I thought an earlier writer (not necessarily a forum member) was talking about two different people. I wish writers would decide what his name should be. |
| Derekap | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Thursday, 24. July 2008, 16:38 Post #45 |
|
Deleted User
|
Again, thanks to Fr Tim Finigan of -hermeneutic-of-continuity for drawing attention to a series of posts by Fr Steven Fisher on Canon Law as applied to clerical blogging: He concludes:
Semper eadem blog KatyA |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Catholic Discussion · Next Topic » |







3:42 PM Jul 11