| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Cohabitees receiving Communion | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Friday, 2. January 2009, 13:47 (865 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 22:25 Post #151 |
|
Deleted User
|
Two points occur to me. Suppose the couple concerned are living happily as man and wife. If we step back from our ingrained positions, what difference does a marriage ceremony make? Does Almighty God require a civil ceremony to determine that people are people of good faith? John |
|
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 22:36 Post #152 |
![]()
Administrator
|
John I have held back from asking these questions. Do you agree with anything the Catholic Church teaches? Are you aware this is a Catholic forum? We are here to encourage each other in our Catholicism, not to knock Church teaching. Matrimony is a sacrament ordained by Jesus Christ.
The sacrament is a public declaration of lifelong commitment. Solemn vows are made in the House of God. There is more to a wedding than the gowns, the meal, the photographs and the honeymoon suite. Nobody mentioned civil ceremonies. Catholics are required to marry according to Church law, the civil law is a matter for Government. When times are tough we married people can look back on our wedding days and remember that beautiful moment when the other person promised to love and to cherish until death do us part, then we remember, it works both ways. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 22:43 Post #153 |
|
Deleted User
|
I don't think you have answered the question Rose. What difference preciselydoes the marriage ceremony make if a strong commitment already exists? I do believe many things that the Catholic church teaches and I am a bit disappointed that you should have to ask that. However, I have no time for slavish devotion that will not ask hard questions--what sort of Faith is that? John |
|
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 22:48 Post #154 |
![]()
Administrator
|
John I was editing my post while you did yours. I was adding to it. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Joe Valente | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:00 Post #155 |
|
I do believe many things that the Catholic church teaches (John Sweeny) So did Martin Luther, so do many Protestants, Jews, etc etc etc etc. So do "pick and mix" Catholics So do those looking for what suits them CATHOLICS BELIEVE IN THE TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH including those teachings that they do not like. |
| What doth it profit a man if he gains the whole world but suffers the loss of his soul | |
![]() |
|
| Mrs.Pogle | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:02 Post #156 |
|
from the woods
|
No, in this case, it requires a Sacrament. The Catechism is quite clear. Question it, of course we may, but that doesn't change it. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:10 Post #157 |
|
Deleted User
|
Joe , if you are going to preach you should at least have the courtesy to spell names correctly. In any case your assertions are wrong. Mrs P., even if you don't question it, what are the reasons behind you accepting it? Why is a union freely entered into it less valid than one where a priest has pronounced on it? I accept your central premise that we should obey the rules even if we believe them to be wrong. John |
|
|
| Mrs.Pogle | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:12 Post #158 |
|
from the woods
|
Because I trust in the teachings of the Church, and until the Pope says we don't need the sacrament of marriage to make it valid ( ), then I will carry on accepting it!
|
![]() |
|
| Joe Valente | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:20 Post #159 |
|
Sorry. Here is the E No . It is all or nothing,, this the Catholic Church we are talking about. No "Pick and Mix" |
| What doth it profit a man if he gains the whole world but suffers the loss of his soul | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:23 Post #160 |
|
Deleted User
|
The E??? |
|
|
| Joe Valente | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:27 Post #161 |
|
Well I did write Sweeny...............................and you reprimanded me not spelling names right, so I returned the E that I had mistakenly dropped. |
| What doth it profit a man if he gains the whole world but suffers the loss of his soul | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:31 Post #162 |
|
Deleted User
|
Ah right, and my reprimand was petty and I hope you will allow me to withdraw it with apologies. My point is that it is urely not enough to accept things without thinking about them. Why does the marriage ceremony make a difference to an existing long term relationship? The Church says it does but I think many catholics have their doubts. John |
|
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 10. May 2009, 23:44 Post #163 |
![]()
Administrator
|
He who says marriage is only a piece of paper, and sets out to live with a woman, unwed, and father her children, learns the value of that piece of paper when she leaves him and takes the children with her. She CHOSE not to have the legal protection of a marriage certificate. She who says marriage is only a piece of paper, and sets out to live with a man, unwed, and bear his children, learns the value of that bit of paper when he leaves her and she learns that she does not have the same legal rights as a married woman. She CHOSE not to have the legal protection of a marriage certificate. With good reason The Church decrees that marriage be formalised. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 11. May 2009, 16:03 Post #164 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
Public proof of the commitment having been made. Or would you argue that cohabitation and a physical relationship are enough for a relationship to become indissoluble? Imagine the implications if that were so! |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Monday, 11. May 2009, 17:18 Post #165 |
![]()
Administrator
|
A couple co-habit, they think their commitment will last. They have a baby. Eight years later the relationship hits a difficult patch, the father leaves to cohabit with a new partner, who bears his child. He leaves that woman. Fifteen years later a couple meet, fall in love, they agree to cohabit in a commited relationship. They raise a family, unaware of their blood relationship. Years later they discover they are half sister and brother. When you marry you know who you are getting, because both must produce their birth certificates. Is that not a good argument for the formalising of marriage, for all including atheists. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Archived Discussions · Next Topic » |





), then I will carry on accepting it!
9:20 AM Jul 11