| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The telly and the radio | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Monday, 27. October 2008, 15:48 (1,049 Views) | |
| Paduan | Friday, 19. December 2008, 01:12 Post #106 |
|
I've watched the whole series of Apparitions. I have to say it was pretty well done (although I'm not too sure that the name of it is particularly 'on-target'). For someone like me there were some heart rending sequences - there have been moments where the narrative and depictions brought a lump to my throat. In tonight's (the last) episode a statue of Our Lady was broken by a diabolically possessed man and I could have cried out. In a previous episode a 'ritual' was performed under duress by the 'Father Jacob' character that was really unsettling. As a drama it definitely provokes thought and portrays a certainty of faith that is rare in any mainstream production these days, even if the whole thing is meant to be something dramatic and suspenseful. It's a shame it wasn't better promoted as the ratings haven't been brilliant, unfortunately. That said, I'm firmly of the opinion that it will have annoyed the rabid atheists and I bet it's done a pretty good (coincidental) job of countering those awful anti-God bus adverts! |
| Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis. | |
![]() |
|
| OsullivanB | Friday, 19. December 2008, 01:37 Post #107 |
|
Didn't episode three cause you any concerns, Paduan? I complained to the BBC because I thought it grotesque that a nun should be shown deliberately eavesdropping on a confession and then reporting what she heard to a Cardinal, who did not stop her but rather congratulated her on a job well done. What impression that gives of the seal for which men have died, I don't know. At any rate I found it very offensive. Not really very happy about Martin Shaw acting out the consecration of the Host either in tonight's episode. Edited by OsullivanB, Friday, 19. December 2008, 01:38.
|
| "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation." Herbert Spencer | |
![]() |
|
| Paduan | Friday, 19. December 2008, 14:43 Post #108 |
|
Certainly I was rather taken aback by the eavesdropping. My immediate reaction was that it was scandalous - but I think that was the whole point: that this rather unpleasant Cardinal - who didn't seem to be fully in tune with the requirements of his faith - was prepared to ride roughshod over the principles of the Church in order to achieve his own political ends and persuade a nun to sin to further his aims. She did at least repent! I found the 'consecration' as portrayed in the circumstances of the drama indicative of the suffering of the character - that's why it was conducted wrongly. Yes, there were shortcomings - for most people these would be regarded as more 'technical' in nature - but overall I think it was a rare production that consistently presented Christian belief in a good - and salvific - light, even if some of the characters within the Church were flawed (as, indeed, I'm sure they have been in real life). I think it's a shame that the ratings weren't particularly high, since the story was clearly open to a sequel. |
| Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis. | |
![]() |
|
| SeanJ | Friday, 3. April 2009, 11:53 Post #109 |
|
Administrator
|
An update on Russel Brand. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sunday, 3. May 2009, 00:50 Post #110 |
|
Deleted User
|
I stumbled upon this Jane Teresa's blog and found myself in agreement with much of what she said:
read more at My heart was restless KatyA |
|
|
| Mrs.Pogle | Sunday, 3. May 2009, 15:21 Post #111 |
|
from the woods
|
I am not against tv per se. I believe there are enough good and life-enhancing/non-damaging programmes on if one exercises discernment, which we should do in all circumstances, as Catholics. I wouldn't throw out the baby with the bathwater. The trouble is, most people can't help watching the drivel! I have really enjoyed watching snooker this last week. I find it relaxing. And I love Gardener's World and Countryfile...and I enjoy watching some films. I stayed up late to watch Amelie last night, and the whole feeling of the film was a good one, and it gave me lots to think about, and has actually led me to reconsider some of my attitudes to life, in a very helpful and positive way ~ a gem of a film!
Edited by Mrs.Pogle, Sunday, 3. May 2009, 15:21.
|
![]() |
|
| draig | Sunday, 3. May 2009, 20:29 Post #112 |
![]()
|
Tell me this is a wind-up, talking about life-enhancement via TV and then going on about watching snooker?
|
| Gripe. Moan. Snipe. Ignore any inconvenient truth. Don't provide specific data. Don't, whatever you do, provide links to hard evidence. The Traditional Way To Maintain A Discussion. | |
![]() |
|
| Mrs.Pogle | Sunday, 3. May 2009, 21:45 Post #113 |
|
from the woods
|
Waddya mean? Snooker's great...
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Archived Discussions · Next Topic » |





9:19 AM Jul 11