| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harasment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| A gay day for the Army - perhaps | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Friday, 25. July 2008, 08:44 (448 Views) | |
| Paduan | Sunday, 27. July 2008, 16:45 Post #31 |
|
Oh for crying out loud... You don't genuinely believe that, do you? |
| I have a blog! - dotCatholic | |
![]() |
|
| Patrick | Sunday, 27. July 2008, 16:59 Post #32 |
![]()
Administrator
|
No, of course not! |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Paduan | Sunday, 27. July 2008, 17:05 Post #33 |
|
I think I might have fallen into the Internet Forum trap I warn people about... taking text on a screen too seriously! Oopsie! |
| I have a blog! - dotCatholic | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 27. July 2008, 17:17 Post #34 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Two young women shared a room in a WRAF barrack block. They bought a car between them - oh dear, that was a sign, was it not, that they were in love? Neither ever went out with boys on the base, or from the village. When one went on leave so did the other. It was obvious they were going away "together" as a couple! My friends were taken off duty, their rooms were ransacked, leave and weekend passes cancelled. Naturally, there was gossip, it was impossible to hide the fact that service police had been in their room. If they had asked the rest of the women, we would have told them, we knew already, the two had first met at a recruiting office, when they called to collect their rail warrants they day they joined. They discovered they had grown up a few hundred yards from each other. Both wanted to be drivers, that resulted in them doing basic and trade training together. By a fluke both were posted to the same base on completion of training. They did not go out with the boys, because soon after they joined, both went on leave and both met young men to whom they later got engaged. They were both engaged to men in their home town, and faithful to their fiances, so spent their free time together. In addition, every person who was known to be friendly with those two, was interviewed. There sure was a witch hunt, partly because there had been several criminal trials (under the Official Secrets Act) of people, mainly civilians, blackmailed because of their hom osex uality.[redit][/redit] Edited by Rose of York, Sunday, 27. July 2008, 17:21.
|
![]() ![]() Catholic and proud of it! Talk to God before Mass. Talk to each other afterwards | |
![]() |
|
| paul | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 20:14 Post #35 |
|
I spent 13 years in the RN. This was during the time when hom osex uals were not allowed. Of course there were, I am sure, many hom osex uals who kept their sexuality private for fear of prosecution, court martial and dissmissal. I only came across two examples, both were dismissed the service, it was very upsetting to see two good men having to leave under a cloud, there were a lot of tears. Fortunately, I never experienced what the armed forces have to accept today. If I had the opportunity to share a shower area with an opposite member of my sex, would I become aroused? Of course I would. How would I feel if I noticed a male becoming aroused whilst watching me shower- sick and very annoyed. How would the authorities deal with that scenario I wonder. It is a very sad condition, I do think that hom osex uals could still be blackmailed to reveal classified information even if it was known they had this tendency. Could the armed forces, like the church, demand celibacy from hom osex uals? paul |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 20:24 Post #36 |
![]()
Administrator
|
That would most likely be unlawful under current discrimination legislation. Heterosexual or hom osex ual, the armed forces do not question personnel about what happens in private accommodation between consenting adults. There are plenty of service personnel openly co-habiting with members of the opposite sex and fathering or mothering children of those relationships. They are not disciplined for their sexual activities. |
![]() ![]() Catholic and proud of it! Talk to God before Mass. Talk to each other afterwards | |
![]() |
|
| OsullivanB | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 20:28 Post #37 |
|
This is called the Catholic Cyberforum. Where are the Catholic issued in this thread? I.e. what is it about the Roman Catholic faith that offers special insights into the question of whether people whose sexual orentation is to their own sex are appropriate members of the defence forces of their country? |
![]() |
|
| OsullivanB | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 20:36 Post #38 |
|
This is something I haven't heard before. Can you refer me to a source (preferably a Roman one) for this proposition? Are you perhaps thinking of the Sacred Band of Thebes? (For which see Plutarch: Lives: Pelopidas). |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 20:36 Post #39 |
![]()
Administrator
|
OsullivanB The issue of hom osex uality is (in my opinion) justifably discussed, from the perspective of morality (as is co-habiting by heterosexual persons). However you have given food for thought. Perhaps the originator of this discussion could say what is specifically Catholic or Christian about whether homosexually orientated persons should serve in the armed forces. My own opinion is, no person should indulge in sexual activity with a person of the same or opposite sex, in a barrack block, a navy mess, a civilian office, a factory floor, a bus stop etc. So, as you say, what have the forces got to do with it? What about student halls of residence or the showers at swimming pools or health clubs? Similar situation. |
![]() ![]() Catholic and proud of it! Talk to God before Mass. Talk to each other afterwards | |
![]() |
|
| OsullivanB | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 20:42 Post #40 |
|
Thank you Rose. You have my point exactly. |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 22:02 Post #41 |
![]()
Administrator
|
We could broaden the discussion to take in the other situation - mixed sexes in the field of battle, or in the emergency services. Men and women go into battle, together. Do they snuggle up to keep warm? If so, does one person get worried about the other, of the opposite sex, being aroused? One would hope that in battle their minds would be on their duty, but they do go on exercise, when they know that barring accident, their lives are not in danger. Two police officers, a man and a woman, sit in a car together all night, keeping observation. Both are married. Temptation is in their way, they could fall in love with each other. Has there been an outcry about such situations? |
![]() ![]() Catholic and proud of it! Talk to God before Mass. Talk to each other afterwards | |
![]() |
|
| John Sweeney | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 22:17 Post #42 |
|
No fo course there hasn't Rose because most mature people accept that in the overwhelming number of cases people of all sexual orientations work together as colleagues without any sexual connotations. Sometimes , of course, colleagues become attracted to each other but this happens whether they are gay, heterosexual and whether they are in the army or in an office or a shop. John |
![]() |
|
| OsullivanB | Sunday, 17. August 2008, 22:28 Post #43 |
|
In such a general discussion I am sure Patrick would not have made the cheap jest which I found offensive.
Edited by OsullivanB, Sunday, 17. August 2008, 22:32.
|
![]() |
|
| Patrick | Monday, 18. August 2008, 12:30 Post #44 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Sorry about that, OsullivanB! No offence intended! |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| OsullivanB | Monday, 18. August 2008, 13:26 Post #45 |
|
Understood Patrick. And from my side, I try to be aware that I can become oversenstive about what is an aspect of my life - very far from the whole of it. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Archived Discussions · Next Topic » | |










5:58 PM Nov 24