| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Glasgow Trial; Priest's role | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Saturday, 5. May 2007, 20:51 (1,357 Views) | |
| medjugorje vin | Saturday, 12. May 2007, 18:44 Post #61 |
|
Rose of York wrote:
john sweeney wrote:
7 represents perfection and is the sign of God,divine worship,completions,obedience and rest.The "prince" of Bible numbers,it is used 562 times,including its derivatives (e.g seventh,sevens).(See Genesis 2:1-4,Psalm 119:164,and Exodus 20:8-11 for just a few examples). The number seven is also the most common in Biblical prophecy,occuring 42 times in Daniel and Revelation alone.In Revelation there are seven churches seven spirits seven golden candlesticks seven stars seven seals seven horns seven eyes seven angels seven trumpets seven thunders seven thousand slain seven heads seven crowns seven last plagues seven golden vials seven mountains seven kings Don't forget the seven deadly sins ,now I am even being accused of paganism :rolleyes: Praised be Jesus and Mary ALWAYS Medjugorje Vin |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Saturday, 12. May 2007, 21:02 Post #62 |
![]()
Administrator
|
I take it that if I see injustice or harm done, I should raise my concerns by as many multiples of 7 as necessary. Sorry, Medjurje Vin, I do not see what the number 7 has to do with this issue. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| K.T.B. | Saturday, 12. May 2007, 22:10 Post #63 |
|
The child protection procedures now used by the church, if implemented properly, should protect innocent people, such as poor Father McKenna, from baseless accusations. In the case of being aware that individuals are causing damage or distress, and how we act on that knowledge, I feel there is a human weakness, which is probably expoited by the Devil, to stand by and do nothing whilst wrong doing is occurring, thereby commiting sin by "concealment and silence", mentioned by Rose. This "concealment and silence" could be for all sorts of reasons. Sometimes I ask myself how I would have behaved if I was in the crowd during Jesus' trial and crucifixion. I don't really like the answer that comes back at me! |
![]() |
|
| medjugorje vin | Saturday, 12. May 2007, 22:15 Post #64 |
|
Rose of York wrote:
Rose ,you said regarding the number 7 "I don't quite follow" and I have just posted what I was referring too.john sweeney then more or less accused me of paganism which is why I replied as I did.I am aware that it did not have relevance to the issue,so now I will try to clarify my position. Under NO circumstances would I ever cover for ANYONE who abused a position of trust,EVER!!!.There are forces at work over which we have no comprehension and therefore to react in a way in which only compounds the sin is equally wrong. Forgiveness and prudence are two entirely seperate issues. Praised be Jesus and Mary ALWAYS Medjugorje Vin |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Saturday, 12. May 2007, 22:21 Post #65 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Thanks, medjugorje vin. I confess to having misinterpreted your position on this issue. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 00:51 Post #66 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well Rose you take a reasonable position as always but I have to say that I don't understand the reference to 7 at all except as some superstitious non-Christian reference, nor do I understand the nods and winks approach about priests being "Sons of Mary" and the insinuation that there is much more to this than we understand. Sounds like hocus-pocus to me, designed to hide the fact that a priest sinned gravely and that the Church is dodging its share of the blame. John |
|
|
| medjugorje vin | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 10:13 Post #67 |
|
john sweeney wrote:
Anybody who is well versed on our Faith will find absolutely no conflict with what I have posted.The number 7 is referred to often in Homilies in my Church and "Son's of Mary" is a title that has been given to priests since I don't know when. It is really strange john ,but the only time I ever see you enter into a discussion with real fervour is when it is in relation to a bit of Catholic bashing.As for it all being hocus-pocus do you not believe in the supernatural aspect of our Faith? Praised be Jesus and Mary ALWAYS Medjugorje Vin |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 10:21 Post #68 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Any member who wishes to discuss the religious signicance of numbers, can start a new discussion. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 10:59 Post #69 |
![]()
Administrator
|
I get hot under the collar about persons who have authority in the Church, who have covered up abuse, of any form, not only against children. My anger is directed at those who damage The Church. That does not make me a Catholic-basher. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| medjugorje vin | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 12:07 Post #70 |
|
Rose of York wrote:
Rose,I was not referring to you and I was not referring to those who are angry at the damage this type of thing does to our Church and Faith.Believe me I share that anger with everyone else,what I am referring to is those that jump on the bandwagon while hiding behind a cloak of indignation,but in reality are using the situation to Catholic bash. Praised be Jesus and Mary ALWAYS Medjugorje Vin |
![]() |
|
| tomais | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 15:44 Post #71 |
|
Have I really read two- " hocus-pocus" on a Cathilic Forum? Yes I have; and the writings have been on Catholic bashing! Sad irony here- why was this phrase allowed? |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 16:44 Post #72 |
![]()
Administrator
|
tomais, ask a moderator, by private message, and we might tell you. |
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Em. | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 16:59 Post #73 |
|
Tomais God bless. |
|
Divine Mercy | |
![]() |
|
| newminster | Sunday, 13. May 2007, 18:36 Post #74 |
|
Unregistered
|
Tomais, you're not stuck in that myth about it being a corruption of "hoc est enim ...", are you? That was debunked years ago. It's a meaningless phrase which, I would have thought that we Catholics have more to worry us than a meaningless jingle. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Archived Discussions · Next Topic » |





3:49 PM Jul 11