| We hope you enjoy your visit! You're currently viewing Catholic CyberForum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our online cyberparish, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of abuse, personal attacks, blasphemy, racism, threats, harrassment, and crude or sexually-explicit language. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Gospel Puzzles?; [Revised Catholic Edition] | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Tuesday, 24. April 2007, 22:25 (1,411 Views) | |
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 17:35 Post #91 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
I know that when I press a switch the light comes on. It might be a co-incidence, but it seems unlikely! And, no, I don't always trust medical opinion. Vaccines and fluoride for example. I want to try a drug that my doctor and specialist will not prescribe me! |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 17:41 Post #92 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
Also, some scientists and doctors do not believe in God. Most of them seem to be fine with abortion and contraception. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Mairtin | Monday, 23. August 2010, 19:35 Post #93 |
|
Are you seriously saying that if a wonder drug for cancer were discovered tomorrow, you would reject it if you found out that the scientist who discovered it approved of contraception? |
![]() |
|
| Rose of York | Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:03 Post #94 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Some dealers don't believe in God. Gotcha!
|
|
Keep the Faith! | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:15 Post #95 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
No. I am saying that doctors can be wrong. Whereas you seemed to be implying that I ought to trust everything they say. Edited by Clare, Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:17.
|
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:21 Post #96 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
Just to clarify ![]() The drug I would like to try is legal, and some doctors do prescribe it! But most seem unwilling to, even though it is safer than the things they routinely prescribe. It's all to do with Big Pharma. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:22 Post #97 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
Oh, incidentally I would reject a miracle treatment for cancer (or MS) if it were unethical. And doctors aren't known for being keen to uphold pro-life ethics these days. The end justifies the means as far as they're concerned. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Mairtin | Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:50 Post #98 |
|
I have implied no such thing as that would be contrary to the very principle of science which is that there is no final answer, there is always more to be learned and that learning is only possible through constant challenge to current thinking. The only rule that science imposes is that such challenge has to be based on reason and logic, not unevidenced opinion. When you reject things like the Big Bang and insist on geocentrism, you are not doing so on the basis of logic or reason or scientific evidence - you are rejecting it simply because it conflicts with your particular interpretation of the Bible, an interpretation which is not even endorsed by the Church to which you belong, one of whose fundamental principles is the avoidance of such personal interpretation. |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 20:59 Post #99 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
I may not be doing so on the basis of scientific evidence, Mairtin, because I am not a scientist, but there are scientists who are geocentrists, and they meet with ridicule. And the Church does not condemn geocentrism, to the best of my knowledge. It isn't a heresy, is it? Any new teachings which were not recognised by the Church before surely come under that warning of St Paul's that I have quoted often enough. You would have us believe that what he actually wrote was: "There will come a time when people will start to endure sound doctrine, and will be turned from fables unto the truth." He didn't say that though. It was the other way around. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Mairtin | Monday, 23. August 2010, 21:08 Post #100 |
|
For example?
The Church makes no statment on the matter because she correctly recognises that it is a scientific matter that has absolutely nothing to do with and has no impact on religion. |
![]() |
|
| Mairtin | Monday, 23. August 2010, 21:09 Post #101 |
|
I haven't a clue what you're talking about. |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 21:14 Post #102 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
1 Timothy 4:3-4
How very true. People today will not endure sound doctrine (for example the truth of Genesis), but instead embrace the new doctrine of evolution, from their new "teachers", and in so doing, they reject the truth in favour of fables. It applies to a lot of modern ideas. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Monday, 23. August 2010, 21:16 Post #103 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
Scientists alive today who accept the biblical account of creation Though, whether they're actually geocentrists I'm not sure. I'll dig a bit more around google. Surely, though, merely accepting Genesis is "bad enough"! Edited by Clare, Monday, 23. August 2010, 21:18.
|
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| Mairtin | Monday, 23. August 2010, 21:55 Post #104 |
|
I doubt if you will find even that motley lot support geocentrism. Does it not perturb you at all, Clare, that you have to resort to Protestant fundamentalist sites to get support for your ideas? It seems a rather bizarre contrast to your usual stance on Protestantism and your regular castigation of Church leaders for moving towards what you regard as a Protestant ethos in various aspects of the modern church. |
![]() |
|
| Clare | Tuesday, 24. August 2010, 09:28 Post #105 |
|
Putting the "Fun Dame" into Fundamentalist
|
If Protestant fundamentalists happen to agree with the Popes and Fathers, then I guess that makes the Popes and Fathers Protestant fundamentalist too. Now, there are geocentrist scientists, I just haven't found a site that conveniently gives a list of them. |
|
S.A.G. Motes 'n' Beams blog Join in the Fun Trivia Quiz! | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Archived Discussions · Next Topic » |








7:54 PM Jul 11