| Viewing Single Post From: Why Are There So Few Vocations?; | |
|---|---|
| Rose of York | Tuesday, 26. May 2009, 21:28 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Yes, many wanted to literally take over, they saw that as a progression from lending a hand, supporting the clergy.
Laity got stuck in, organising, with the approval ot the bishop. They did not just decide to "do something". Laity raised the funds. Laity made arrangements for catering. The religious orders and the clergy were free to carry out the functions that are theirs.
What do you mean, not a lot? Some dioceses don't get one new seminarian in a year.
There IS something to prevent some others doing something similar. There was a shouting match in our church because one young woman walked up to me and suggested a group of us organise a barbecue in the grounds. The shouting was "stop interfering only Mrs X is allowed to organise things." The parish priest heard and did not intervene. I suspect he has been worn into the ground by Mrs X and her cohorts. Joe has hit the nail on the head. Lay rule can get out of hand. A strong priest leads a strong parish. |
![]() ![]() Catholic and proud of it! Talk to God before Mass. Talk to each other afterwards | |
![]() |
|
| Why Are There So Few Vocations?; · The Mass , Liturgy, Sacraments, Priesthood | |







6:36 PM Nov 24